Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A module needs to request bounded installation-only operations without retaining a standing runtime role. Add exact setup method selections to the existing module contract and signed manifest, resolve their requirements from the callee, and refuse optional/self/wildcard or out-of-ceiling selections. Add a per-resource-kind owner-aware declaration so callers do not infer enforcement from role names.
This is a proposed owner extension of the existing Core contract, not a solution-side permission mechanism. It builds on the merged installation declarations in #873 and preserves those fields. The candidate was carried from the existing isolated setup worktree onto main 15e7e12; no running composition was changed.
Validation: fresh
go test -count=1 ./contracts/module ./solutionhostpassed; diff check passed. Full Core, tagged infrastructure and composed consumer suites were not run. CLI, Authority, Accounts and solution-runtime consumers require matching changes; this parser addition alone does not grant usable setup authority.Draft: independent architecture review of this head is pending. This belongs to the unfinished installation/durable-review cohort, not the selected upload/extraction demo. The existing candidate Authority dispatcher still has a trusted-host fixture-consent integration blocker; this PR must not be represented as qualification of that cohort. Owner contract acceptance, matching consumer review and release/adoption remain required.
Independent review status
Independent architecture-bouncer review at da5e9b0 is conditional. Matching candidate consumers do not compile with their committed dependency selections, and Records206 does not yet declare the owner-aware enforcement required by Authority for setup. The per-binding union of method scopes also leaves a policy-evolution review question for the contract/Authority owners. Core focused tests passed; this is not a usable published installation cohort.