Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft: installation setup authority
This candidate extends the existing Authority issue/check and signed-delivery paths with attempt-bound, exact-method setup calls and dispatch before activation. This is an owner fix candidate that reuses Authority's existing lifecycle, scope and delivery mechanisms.
Blocked; do not merge. The production trusted-host fixture path supplies no consent receipt, but the dispatcher requires one. It cannot reach its callback and leaves installation pending. An Authority-owned design for authentic attempt-bound trusted-host evidence and a production-wired regression are required. Do not invent person consent or skip acknowledgement. The handbook's HOST-INST stories require pending and acknowledgement; no accepted cross-repository decision was found for this exact-method capability. A proposal, owner agreement and independent review of this revision and affected consumers remain required.
The new Core fields depend on Core's draft at da5e9b0de91584459d4ae201b4f2855cc7122524. That fork commit is not resolvable as a
codefly-dev/coreGo revision yet; dependency pins remain old and this branch is not independently buildable with released dependencies. Generated outputs are carried from the candidate and must be regenerated/verified through Codefly against the accepted contracts before merge.Validation and limits
go test ./authority ./decide ./delivered ./offers ./memstorein authority-core andgo test ./plugins/composition ./plugins/installation ./pkg/business/statein the local service.Independent review status
Independent architecture-bouncer review at c06a93c does not establish design acceptance and blocks implementation qualification. Committed dependency versions do not compile; callback acknowledgement/failure semantics diverge from the accepted lifecycle; fixture-driven installations can lack the required consent record. Local substituted tests are narrower evidence. Owner contract disposition, lifecycle correction and compatible published dependencies are required.