Skip to content

test(reports): reconstruct #878 comparison criterion-coordinate contract - #1033

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
feat/leftover-map-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2920from
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2930
Draft

test(reports): reconstruct #878 comparison criterion-coordinate contract#1033
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
feat/leftover-map-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2920from
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2930

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reconstruction authority

The historical v2.93 source/docs tree is not replayed. Grouping-comparison criterion markers must consume only finite persisted item axes, preserve (0.00, 0.00), omit invalid coordinates independently of post ξ, and use distinct comparison-graphic naming. Report criterion naming remains separate; ζ is never inferred from person axes, geometry, distance, rank, or other evidence.

#1034 is based on this exact head. No ancestor validation receipt transfers. Keep Draft until the local contract is causally GREEN and fresh exact-head repository/security/browser/a11y/performance evidence plus qualifying independent approval are current. Localization remains owned by canonical #922/#929 translation-ledger boundaries.

…on graphic leftover-map criterion markers independently of leftover-map post ξ markers (v2.93.0)

Caption leftover-map comparison graphic leftover-map criterion markers with persisted leftover-map item coordinates through leftoverMapComparePlotCriterionBadge independently of leftover-map post ξ markers (ADR 0336). Rank-0 unused axes still name leftover-map item coordinates (0.00, 0.00). A missing or non-finite leftover-map item coordinate pair omits independently of leftover-map post ξ. Do not invent leftover-map item coordinates from leftover-map post ξ. UI-only; no SQL; never invent a leftover score or a theta.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Ordinary non-force ancestry adoption. Preserve #1033 reconstructed comparison criterion-coordinate contract and historical #878 product ancestry.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reconstruction authority has moved non-force with its live parent. Exact head is now 6db5cb714f58050e6a70c67618ca52fcdda3b41b, based on repaired #876 259e2d1ad8545bda75873a15c9e1b0de13996e4f. The reconstructed #878 comparison criterion-coordinate contract and historical #878 product ancestry are preserved; the stale full historical tree is still not replayed. #1034 was subsequently converged from this exact head. No ancestor validation receipt transfers; remain Draft pending fresh gates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working priority: high

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant