Skip to content

test(reports): reconstruct #879 comparison post-coordinate contract - #1034

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2930from
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-post-coordinates-v2940
Draft

test(reports): reconstruct #879 comparison post-coordinate contract#1034
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-criterion-coordinates-v2930from
repair/leftover-map-compare-plot-post-coordinates-v2940

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reconstruction authority

Historical v2.94 source/docs are not replayed. Grouping-comparison post markers consume only finite persisted person axes, preserve (0.00, 0.00), omit invalid coordinates independently of criterion ζ, and use distinct comparison-graphic naming. Report post naming stays separate; ξ is never inferred from item axes, geometry, distance, rank, or other evidence.

No direct open child remains on this repaired branch and no ancestor validation receipt transfers. Keep Draft until the local contract is causally GREEN and fresh exact-head repository/security/browser/a11y/performance evidence plus qualifying independent approval are current. Localization remains owned by canonical #922/#929 translation-ledger boundaries.

…ison graphic leftover-map post markers independently of leftover-map criterion leftover-map item coordinates (v2.94.0)

Caption leftover-map comparison graphic leftover-map post markers with persisted leftover-map person coordinates through leftoverMapComparePlotPostBadge independently of leftover-map criterion leftover-map item coordinates (ADR 0337). Rank-0 unused axes still name leftover-map person coordinates (0.00, 0.00). A missing or non-finite leftover-map person coordinate pair omits independently of leftover-map criterion ζ. Do not invent leftover-map person coordinates from leftover-map item coordinates ζ. UI-only; no SQL; never invent a leftover score or a theta.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Ordinary non-force ancestry adoption. Preserve #1034 reconstructed comparison post-coordinate contract and historical #879 product ancestry.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reconstruction authority is now exact 5015f19361f6732b2e72ad3edc14806d9a74cd16, an ordinary non-force adoption of repaired #1033 6db5cb714f58050e6a70c67618ca52fcdda3b41b. The reconstructed #879 comparison post-coordinate contract and historical #879 product ancestry remain preserved, while stale historical source/docs are not replayed. The former inherited #859 assertion RED is repaired in ancestry, but no predecessor validation receipt transfers; this PR remains Draft pending fresh exact-head gates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working priority: high

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant