Skip to content

Address JOSS reviewer typos and clarify format support#92

Open
vgreg wants to merge 1 commit into64-submit-paper-to-jossfrom
handle-referee-comments
Open

Address JOSS reviewer typos and clarify format support#92
vgreg wants to merge 1 commit into64-submit-paper-to-jossfrom
handle-referee-comments

Conversation

@vgreg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@vgreg vgreg commented May 6, 2026

Summary

Addresses the paper portion of the JOSS reviewer's feedback on openjournals/joss-reviews#10480:

  • Fixed five typos flagged by the reviewer (developement, such a generators, missing closing em-dash on cancellations or executions, PyPi Stats, during from the time they became available).
  • Updated the supported-formats footnote: ITCH 4.1/5.0-only → all Nasdaq ITCH versions from 2.0 to 5.0, and added IEX DEEP (both since-released).

The non-paper items from the same review (missing meatpy.__version__, version metadata inconsistency across pyproject.toml / uv.lock / PyPI, sample data) will be addressed in a separate PR against `main`.

Test plan

  • Re-render the paper and skim for any additional inconsistencies introduced by the format-support rewording.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Fixed typos and updated the supported-formats footnote to reflect
current ITCH (2.0-5.0) and IEX DEEP support.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant