[HemSoft]

Summary

Split manual iPhone/iPad qualification into six shards per family, using retained hosted test durations to balance the original 29 journeys into 8, 8 and 13. Supplemental, synthetic commerce and native commerce run separately. Each worker retains its 90-minute limit and qualified Xcode 26.6 / iOS 26.2 runtime. All 53 journeys per family and native preparation/reset remain required.

Repair failures exposed by qualification: tolerate sub-micropoint touch-target rounding, supply an explicit reported zero in zero-usage Grok fixtures while keeping missing percentages unavailable, and wait for the old billing warning to disappear after Reload Sign-In. The production quota parser is unchanged.

Integrate the authorized Chief #40 v2 proposal into the existing manual aggregate. Its exact tested inline script can post a source-linked event hint to the run's matching current open same-repository/default-base PR. Only that aggregate gains PR write permission, including on manual main/no-PR executions. Matrix and automatic jobs receive no new rights. Actual bot comment and exact Chief-thread wake were verified on the previous required run; early failure delivery remains unqualified.

Add fixture-gated producer observations for the remaining native readiness failure. The app reports existing catalog/StoreKit-await/readiness transitions; the unchanged XCTest predicate reports wait boundaries and its first positive observation. A bounded collector binds the owned simulator, source, clocks, run UUID and app/runner PIDs, preserves the original test failure and cleanup, and exports session evidence before final hashing. This is diagnostic instrumentation, not a claimed product repair.

Add an explicit manual cost-only control to reject mismatched runner images/toolchains before lint. Both roles retain the same verified controller outside the checkout, remove the same candidate paths and verify an empty index/worktree before materializing the selected immutable source. Complete Actions elapsed and summed job runtime still include all setup/removal/materialization; there is no tolerance or deducted overhead. Ordinary PR execution remains pinned SwiftLint and four policy assertions; full native validation is unchanged for full mode.

Closes #517.

Acceptance Criteria

• Measured manual-only partition, with unchanged 90-minute worker limits, native quality workloads, needs and concurrency.
• All 53 distinct journeys and three preparation/reset invocations per family remain required. Missing, duplicate, stale, substituted and wrong-runtime proofs fail closed.
• Ordinary automatic PR execution retains its runner, permissions, depth-one checkout, pinned SwiftLint, four policy tests and ten-minute ceiling. Manual-only changes comprise UI sharding, the approved aggregate relay and an isolated cost-control mode; full/account-menu native workloads retain their needs, limits and selectors.
• Current repair-head automatic SwiftLint and completed cost acceptance. The previous b654 result53s/50s versus55s/50s remains historical evidence below.
• All five quality jobs, twelve UI workers and Full iOS UI validation pass on this exact candidate.

Definition of Done

• Confirmed fixture and numerical repairs have relevant local evidence, including an old-source regression failure and corrected native/UI controls.
• Authorized v2 relay is byte-equal to its tested candidate; offline authentication, targeting, deduplication and permission-boundary controls pass.
• Clean connected Codex review completed for current merge head cb9f1b03397ce1362973fcc56a57c98fc4fd10e6 at1:00PM EDT. No duplicate review requested. The earlier independent cost reviews remain historical evidence.
• Required SwiftLint passed for current head in automatic run40364006120. Its47s elapsed/37s summed job runtime is an ordinary unpaired observation, not guarded cost acceptance.
• Project owner performs the ordinary match-head guarded source merge after all current-head review, required checks, cost and full qualification gates pass. Home operations, deployment and customer releases remain outside this authorization.

Main reconciliation, October26

Resolved the two document conflicts by retaining both changelog entries and the twelve-worker/53-journey instructions. Main’s native expiration test is inherited byte-for-byte. Workflow, phase/shard manifests, observer collector and cost-controller bytes match8befdb5 exactly. Source is clean after a normal merge commit, with no rebase or force push.

Local validation: 149 Python tests passed, covering release/function-risk/CI/shard/cost/observer/account-menu controls; 14 offline relay tests passed. Diff and conflict-marker checks passed. No native execution, cost rerun or full dispatch was performed. The existing failed cost pair57s/52s versus54s/50s remains retained and non-passing; its two authorized dispatches were consumed. Current-head cost and full qualification remain open.

Validation

Candidate head: cb9f1b03397ce1362973fcc56a57c98fc4fd10e6, integrating main f2ce58a30628ad11bd6e58cae0a3b76208466b55.

The ONE predeclared guarded cost pair completed: baseline40263990934 measured54s complete elapsed/50s summed non-skipped job runtime; candidate40296407578 measured57s/52s. Both passed their workloads and exact source/image/toolchain/preparation checks, but the pair FAILS strict non-increase in both measures. Image20261021.0445.8, Xcode26.6/17F113, toolchain/config hash37676db6b5939b58874241a3051acc228476a32e1c3e79c871ed9b61d902cba5. Full controller8befdb59cca29c8b73cd296a5a0a9697c5e5c53b; baseline measured d58713e and candidate measured8befdb59cca29c8b73cd296a5a0a9697c5e5c53b. Both removed563 common candidate paths and proved zero index/worktree entries before materialization. No deductions/tolerance, retry, new pair or full/native dispatch. Both authorized pair dispatches are consumed; no passing cost proof exists for this head.

Branch-dispatch correction: the next independent review found that an unset checkout ref leaves the planned branch dispatch attached. Cost mode now explicitly checks out github.sha; ordinary modes retain the original empty/default ref. The workflow-contract regression fails onbf5e257 and passes here. All30affected controls (16cost,4policy,10shard), actionlint1.7.12 and diff checks pass. At historical8befdb5, independent and connected Codex reviews were clean; zero unresolved threads. Required SwiftLint now passes; the guarded pair above is complete and failed non-increase. No new full/native dispatch has occurred.

Cost-control correction: a fresh independent review at local35cbb6f found that switching an already populated candidate tree only charged the baseline for rewriting changed paths. The repair now retains/verifies the controller outside the checkout and materializes both roles from an identical empty tracked-index/worktree state. A new real-Git regression fails on35cbb6f and passes on the repair. Attached branches, changed controller bytes and ignored leftovers refuse qualification.29affected controls (15cost,4policy,10shard), actionlint1.7.12 and diff checks pass. Earlier97Python evidence belongs to35cbb6f; unchanged observer/runner evidence remains historical. A NEW independent Codex/high review covers the complete cost delta at this head; connected review and ordinary CI now pass. The pair above is complete and failed non-increase; no new full/native dispatch has occurred.

The prepared single pair uses exact default-base d58713e889fbfe3a025f0966cef5345099418e42 and this candidate, with the same frozen workflow/controller ref. Actual image/default-Xcode/Swift/OS/architecture/CPU/memory and source receipts must match before the workload. Both complete-run elapsed and summed non-skipped job time must demonstrate non-increase. All prior adverse comparisons remain below. No baseline-source run is accepted as current-head source validation. Native/full qualification remains separately required and undispatched.

Observer local evidence: 82 Python controls pass, comprising 37 observer and 45 existing runner/shard tests. Eight new fake-OS fault scenarios fail on saved v1 and pass after independent bounded cleanup/error-precedence repair; the benign absent-group case passes both. The source compiles with complete strict concurrency under qualified Xcode26.6/17F113, SDK26.5 arm64; Release warnings-as-errors passes. All five Swift files are byte-identical to those compiled/strict-linted and exercised by eight standalone fixture-guard checks. Canonical SwiftLint0.65.1 reports zero violations. Workflow/project/manifest bytes, all53 journeys per family, five native phases, original30s wait/predicate/static waiter/assertion/lazy message, and independent payment feedback are preserved. No UI journey or live collector was rerun for this observer patch.

Collector limits are15s/command and60s shared per phase, one final2s cleanup wait,8MiB combined stdout/stderr,32MiB runner-log parse and256MiB/2048 monitored staging entries, with a separate32MiB retained-session cap. Cap/parse/cleanup/write failures cannot qualify success. A prior native65 remains primary over observer failure and reset failure. Timed-out or failed cleanup does not imply the process was successfully reaped. Supplied-ready and first-positive callback are observations, not proof of AX publication or internal SDK fulfillment. Cross-process clock alignment remains bounded by timestamp/offset uncertainty; logging can perturb scheduling. Current-source coverage-based risk and full hosted acceptance remain pending.

Independent local Codex/high review completed clean for this exact head after resolving four findings: cleanup exception precedence, lowercase StoreKit subsystem, producer-sized staging with a separate retained-session limit, and the documented split provisioning/execution ownership path. Generated-predicate, exact retained producer-shape and split-directory regressions fail before their fixes and pass afterward. The prior observer head passed connected Codex, SwiftLint and automatic cost. The timestamp repair at historical91b8 has a clean connected Codex review and passing SwiftLint. The current cost-control head has clean connected review and required SwiftLint; guarded-pair cost acceptance and full hosted qualification remain open.

Timestamp repair: the failed producer's log parser rejects fractional query dates. Whole-second UTC query bounds now round outward, while app/SDK records are filtered back to the exact fractional phase before app identity validation. Explicit log timestamp parsing handles Python3.9's offset format. Retained-archive validation gives expected old-format exit64, corrected exit0,37queried events and36inside the exact phase. New regressions fail on the parent and pass on the repair. The independent reviewer additionally passed boundary/timezone and fail-closed checks. No fresh native collection or full-run pass is claimed.

Earlier validated steps:

• Final relay adaptation: 49 Python tests and 14 Node 24 mocked tests pass. The Node tests execute the actual inline workflow script. actionlint 1.7.12 and diff checks pass. The additional Python and Node tests are manual-only; automatic policy tests remain four.
• Approved proposal: 39 offline tests pass on air: six patch/schema tests, fourteen v2 tests, twelve archived v1 controls, three pinned T3 evaluator tests and four existing policy tests against a temporary candidate snapshot. V1 is not integrated. Dynamic and step-level permission probes fail with the expected actionlint diagnostics.
• Workflow bytes exactly match the v2 candidate. Inline script SHA-256 is 4f299b77c869f5674c5fc63a9af4cd208a0ac17c39a43b8b88b8538763229ead. Removing its single step and aggregate write grant restores the prior complete workflow hash ff422d0b6e584bbdde570c4ca15ab05d97341b53bb34ab3451bdee3543a49d63.
• Native fixture regression fails on the old omitted-zero fixtures with two expected assertion failures in 0.073 seconds. It passes on the repaired source, including omitted/null and reported-zero controls. Exact 2168118 execution passes in 0.021 seconds.
• Exact 2168118 local UI validation passes two complete Grok journeys, 30.021 and 60.477 seconds, plus the existing header test's billing-only subjourney, 119.285 seconds. Source stayed unchanged during execution and the owned device shut down. This is not a complete header journey or full-family proof. Subsequent relay edits change no Swift source.
• Swift source at 2168118: pinned SwiftLint passes with zero violations across 284 files. No Swift source changed during relay integration.
• Standalone Swift/XCTest replays the hosted 43.99999999999997 < 44 failure, then passes the corrected comparison while rejecting 43, 43.9, 43.999 and 43.99999-point targets. All five sibling touch-target assertions use the same one-micropoint allowance.
• A full header journey at historical ba684b7 failed after 631 seconds at the immediate billing-warning disappearance assertion, before reaching the geometry checks. An unchanged billing-only control passed in 121 seconds. That adverse result is retained; the corrected bounded wait is covered by the 119-second control above.
• Fresh current-head Codex review completed clean at 8:11 PM EDT, with zero review threads. One request was made for this bundle. Earlier reviews remain historical; no duplicate is requested.

Full hosted acceptance remains open

Original run 40136984441 is at historical a1e80c3 and cannot qualify this changed head or acquire the relay step retroactively. It completed failure at 8:12:19 PM EDT with all five quality jobs passed, seven UI workers passed and five failed. Useful work was preserved until terminal; no old history was cancelled or rewritten. The last iPad original-2 worker ran 8 journeys, 6 passed and 2 failed at the same repaired Grok lines 100 and 392; no distinct fault was found in that worker.

Four previously diagnosed failed workers are iPhone native, iPhone original-1, iPhone original-2 and iPad original-3. See the retained native diagnosis and additional failures. Grok fixture and geometry failures have confirmed repairs. The hosted native purchase trust stall and iPad credit-tile navigation failure remain unresolved; passing local controls do not establish their cause or repair.

The iPad native producer passed both journeys and preparation/reset in 675.547 seconds, with validated historical-source proof. Its image was 20261021.0445.8, versus failed iPhone image 20261013.0424.1. Xcode/SDK/runtime match, but image and device family are confounded. No cause is attributed to either difference. The unchanged selected Greptile iPad method passed locally in about 303 seconds; hosted diagnostics confirm a correct hit point and received touch events but no sheet. No speculative StoreKit or navigation change is included.

The replacement full run 40146062194 at historical e7ea659967cac2e4cbf7fea4885379f1e7579576 completed FAILURE October24 at10:38:21PM EDT. All five quality jobs and eleven of twelve UI workers passed. The sole iPad native failure stopped at initial readiness, before Purchase or Restore; preparation and reset passed but the later native error journey was not reached. Its source-bound full gate remains failed.

That producer logged28.901s trust evaluation. The original30s waiter entered9:49:17.288PM EDT; its final ready query began9:49:47.294PM, after the nominal deadline, and returned ready just before timedOut. This does not prove incorrect timeout after a timely ready observation. The app-ready timestamp and SDK continuation versus AX scheduling interval were missing. Qualified local native and real-AX controls did not reproduce a contract violation. Synthetic worker controls located their own late task resumption before the actor hop, not a hosted StoreKit cause. No timeout or product fix is included.

After clean current-head review, required checks, same-image automatic-cost acceptance and zero unresolved threads were verified, one normal full observer qualification run40215906682 was dispatched October25 at1:19PM EDT. Exact head b65417f9ba6178bd80febe8953e8ed4d466e06a9, ref fix/issue-517-manual-ui-shards, ui_validation_mode=full. It completed FAILURE October25 at3:45:43PM EDT. All five quality jobs and ten UI workers passed. All ten compact proofs validate51non-native journeys per family. Both first native Purchase/Restore journeys passed, but required observer collection exited64 because log show rejected fractional query-date syntax. Preparation/reset passed; native error preparation/journey were not reached, leaving52/53journeys and2/3preparation/reset invocations per family. Every UI worker finished below90minutes, maximum57m26s, but the full gate remains failed. The scoped timestamp-format/exact-phase-filter repair is now published at 91b8e826353b378de82b104c5833f6acf5e3fbb4 after a clean independent Codex/high review. Historical91b8 connected review and SwiftLint passed. The current cost-control head has clean connected review and required SwiftLint. Automatic-cost acceptance remains blocked by the observations below; no further full dispatch is authorized without Root cost/identity review. All five quality jobs, twelve workers,53distinct journeys per family and three preparation/reset invocations remain required. Native30-second readiness assertions,90-minute worker ceilings, failure handling and concurrency are unchanged. No local or skipped PR status substitutes for this gate. No duplicate dispatch or cancellation was made.

Automatic cost evidence

The historical original baseline took 7,214 seconds for the iPad original phase. Its 29 tests sum to 6,624.54 seconds. The measured partitions contain 2,212.66 / 2,205.04 / 2,206.84 historical test-seconds before fresh build overhead. These are allocation inputs, not candidate durations. The earlier 90-minute run timed out before completing that phase.

Completed automatic observation	Workflow elapsed	Summed job runtime	API billable MACOS / UBUNTU
Baseline 40010770987, attempt 1	3,215s	43s	0ms / 0ms
Candidate a1, 40136971209, attempt 1	55s	50s	0ms / 0ms
Baseline 40010770987, predeclared paired attempt 2	55s API / 54s timestamps	50s	0ms / 0ms
Candidate a1, 40136971209, paired attempt 2	44s API / 43s timestamps	39s	0ms / 0ms
Candidate ba684b7, 40143550938, first automatic run	32s	29s	0ms / 0ms
Integrated e7ea659, 40145484684, first automatic run	51s	48s	0ms / 0ms
Observer b65417f, 40215383489, first automatic run	53s	50s	Not re-queried
Repair 91b8e82, 40228586272, first automatic run	57s	54s	Not re-queried
Baseline 40010770987, predeclared paired attempt 3	48s	43s	Not re-queried
Repair 91b8e82, paired attempt 2	49s	44s	Not re-queried
Cost-control head8befdb5, ordinary first automatic run40262173440, unpaired	1068s	42s	Not re-queried

The initial comparison increased summed runner time by seven seconds and is retained as non-passing. One predeclared pair then passed on the same image 20261013.0424.1; the later ba684b7 first run used that image too. The one-second API/timestamp discrepancy is shown explicitly. No measurement was rerun until green. Zero API billable milliseconds are not a waiver or dollar estimate. The integrated head's first automatic run also used that image. Its 51s elapsed and 48 job-seconds stay below the retained default-code baseline's 55s and 50s, although the intermediate ba684b7 candidate ran faster. No additional cost-measurement rerun was requested. The observer head also used image20261013.0424.1 and completes at53s/50s, below/equal to55s/50s. Its automatic workflow and all skipped-job end timestamps agree at53s; no timing rerun or billable-time waiver was used. This automatic comparison does not qualify the full manual gate.

The repair head's first57s/54s observation is non-passing against55s/50s. One additional pair was predeclared before execution and both checks passed, but its baseline48s/43s and candidate49s/44s do not demonstrate non-increase. Images also differ: baseline20261021.0445.8 versus candidate20261013.0424.1, violating the predeclared same-image condition. Both raw results and the failed acceptance are retained. No further cost rerun or full manual dispatch was requested. Automatic job/trigger bytes and four lightweight policy assertions remain unchanged; download/setup variance is observed but does not waive the cost gate.

The ordinary8befdb5 automatic check passed on image20261021.0445.8, but its1068s complete elapsed/42s summed runtime does not demonstrate elapsed non-increase against the historical55s/50s baseline. It is retained without queue/setup deductions and is not substituted for the completed, non-passing predeclared guarded pair.

Permissions and notification limits

The approved aggregate token grant remains on manual main/no-PR executions even when the notifier skips. No step/expression permission workaround is used. Main/current-default, tags and absent/stale/fork/nondefault-base PRs do not receive comments. Unknown/authentication/transport errors remain visible; there is no automatic POST retry, fallback, new secret, app scope, job, trigger, timer or listener.

Hints occur only after the aggregate starts. They cannot guarantee early failure, final workflow completion, delivery, exact owner-thread wake or exactly-once posting. A positive hint means passed-so-far, and the owner independently verifies actual Actions state. Hard timeout, cancellation and runner death may prevent posting. Chief #40 remains open for the early-delivery gap. The actual bot comment and exact Chief-thread wake were verified on the failed replacement run. The comment preceded workflow completion and arrived46m22s after the native failure; Chief independently verified actual terminal state. No live synthetic comment or extra dispatch is used to test delivery.

No product UI or production quota/auth behavior changes are included. Native quality jobs, all 53 UI journeys, preparation/reset, timeouts and concurrency remain intact. This work authorizes no App Store submission, customer release, pricing change or paid purchase.

PR524 merged main’s manifest repair and bounded native-expiration failure capture, closing issue523. Current merge head integrates those main changes. No source was rewritten or force-pushed; prior8befdb5 is retained in history and a local recovery bundle. Its receipts are not current-head qualification.
Current merge-head review is now clean and required SwiftLint is green. Cost acceptance and the exact-head full gate remain blocked. The prior one-pair authorization was consumed by the preserved54s/50s versus57s/52s failure. A concrete proposal for one current-main f2ce58a versus candidate cb9f1b0 pair is retained at /tmp/codexbar-517-main-reconcile-20261026/next-cost-proposal.json, with exact same-image/toolchain guards, unchanged strict metrics, one run per role and no retry. This is a budget decision request, not an authorized or started run; no improvement is inferred from the ordinary47s/37s observation. No additional pair or full/native dispatch occurred.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T12:15:11.842221Z	4b9f183	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[HemSoft]

Hosted native failure diagnosis, October 24, 2026

Head a1e80c358f753f9c6319faf6bc0b90f6cdc580ea remains unchanged. Full hosted qualification has not passed; do not merge.

Run 40136984441, iPhone native job 121007185295, failed at 6:44:09 PM EDT after 514 seconds. Its 72.8 MB diagnostic artifact was downloaded and the xcresult, simulator unified log, test receipts and failure attachments inspected.

• testPurchaseAndRestore failed at ProCommerceJourneyTests.swift:423. After tapping Buy lifetime, the 30-second wait for pro-command-status expired. The hierarchy remained Free plan with pro-command-busy showing Completing your purchase. The test failed after 48.012 seconds. Restore was not reached.
• Preparation passed one test with three local products, zero transactions and USA storefront. The simulator's local StoreKit server explicitly confirmed the lifetime purchase with dialogs disabled, returned one transaction and synced one unfinished transaction. This is evidence against a missing catalog, lost dialog override or pending purchase-confirmation dialog.
• The daemon's Invalid response for purchase intake message also appears in the earlier passing air run. It is not a causal diagnosis.
• The distinguishing recorded boundary is certificate verification. At 6:42:19.721 PM EDT, the app started a Security trust evaluation for the purchase. No return for that trust object appears before the assertion at approximately 6:42:50 PM EDT. Earlier app-receipt trust evaluation returned successfully. In the fresh air control, corresponding purchase verification returned in about one millisecond. This locates the last uncompleted observed operation, but does not prove the underlying daemon, scheduling, network or app-concurrency cause. No hosted process stack was captured.
• Cleanup reset still passed one test and the owned simulator shut down. The failure correctly produced no passing shard proof. Error preparation and the error-purchase journey were not executed after the primary failure.

One unchanged-source reproduction ran on a new air simulator from 7:15:26 to 7:21:38 PM EDT, using the exact committed runner:

DEVELOPER_DIR=/Applications/Xcode_26.6.app/Contents/Developer \
  python3 scripts/ui_release_shards.py run --family iphone --shard native \
  --output /tmp/codexbar-517-native-failure-repro

All five phases passed, comprising two native journeys and three preparation/reset invocations, in 371.546 seconds. Purchase and Restore passed in 24.662 seconds. The proof was checked against the current source fingerprint, Xcode 26.6 / 17F113, SDK 26.5 and iOS Simulator 26.2 / 23C54; owned device shutdown passed. The toolchain records match the failed producer except for the hosted-image identity. This control did not reproduce the hosted failure and does not satisfy hosted acceptance.

All five hosted quality jobs and both supplemental workers had passed at intake. Those two workers cover eight journeys each. Original, synthetic and remaining native coverage was still running or queued in that snapshot; no complete 53-journey family or aggregate pass is claimed. Their useful work has not been cancelled. No hosted retry, source change, timeout extension, test skip or gate waiver was made during diagnosis. The original non-passing automatic-cost comparison and later predeclared passing pair remain in the PR unchanged.

Next checkpoint is the remaining hosted producer evidence, especially the independent iPad native result. If this remains an isolated native failure after the useful jobs complete, one predeclared targeted fresh-worker replay can test transience. It is not a retry-until-green loop. A repeat failure requires stronger hosted diagnostics before a causal fix. Any changed head will require fresh relevant local checks, current-head Codex review and complete hosted qualification.

T3 currently exposes a PR-rollup watch, but no workflow-run subscription. Its required-check wake did not cover this separate dispatch failure. A scheduler webhook is available but requires a configured GitHub event delivery; no webhook, model timer, repository hook, notification job or permissions change was created. Chief owns arranging those manual-run completion/failure events. PR watch alone is not manual-run evidence.

Local diagnostic records: /tmp/codexbar-517-hosted-native-failed/, /tmp/codexbar-517-hosted-native-diagnostics/, /tmp/codexbar-517-hosted-storekit.log, /tmp/codexbar-517-hosted-trust.log, /tmp/codexbar-517-local-storekit-raw.log, /tmp/codexbar-517-repro-trust.log, /tmp/codexbar-517-native-failure-repro/. No credentials were copied or changed.

[HemSoft]

Additional hosted failures, October 24, 2026

The failure set now includes two original UI workers. The earlier conditional idea of an isolated native replay does not apply. Full hosted acceptance remains blocked on head a1e80c358f753f9c6319faf6bc0b90f6cdc580ea.

Failed worker	Actual coverage	Failure
iPhone original-1	Eight executed, seven passed, one failed. Job ended 7:23:42 PM EDT.	CodexCreditsPoolUITests.testCompactCardHeadersAndIndependentControls, line 462, rejected a reported touch-target height of 43.99999999999997 against 44.
iPad original-3	Thirteen executed, twelve passed, one failed. Job ended 7:20:38 PM EDT.	GreptileAllowanceUITests.testReviewHistoryAndBillingAvailabilityStates, line 114, remained on the dashboard after tapping Credits used in the available/full/dark/large-text scenario. The expected metric sheet and History text did not appear.

Both workers failed assertions within their 90-minute limits, rather than timing out. Their receipt failures and missing success proofs were preserved. Metadata, full Xcode logs and receipts were retrieved with capped artifact range reads, 690,316 and 617,392 bytes respectively. The 183,668-byte pre-tap screenshot and 43,460,759-byte Greptile recording were also inspected. The recording confirms that no sheet appeared after the tap.

A standalone Swift/XCTest replay using the exact reported CGFloat and assertion reproduced the floating-point failure in 0.013 seconds. A one-micropoint comparison allowance passed that sample while still rejecting 43, 43.9, 43.999 and 43.99999-point targets. A narrow correction is prepared. No touch-target layout or minimum will change.

A single selected Greptile test is running on air with a new qualified iPad mini / iOS 26.2 simulator and unchanged committed source. Its corresponding full/dark/large-text tile-to-History scenario passed locally; the remaining scenarios in that same test are still executing. This is diagnostic evidence, not a hosted acceptance pass or proof that the hosted failure is fixed. No speculative navigation or StoreKit code change has been made.

Useful original, synthetic and native jobs were left running or queued. No hosted replay or new manual dispatch was started. All 53 journey identities and preparation/reset phases remain required. The initial adverse automatic-cost comparison and later passing predeclared pair are retained.

Chief is arranging a future manual-only workflow-to-PR event relay separately. It cannot retrofit this dispatch, and no polling loop, model timer or public webhook has been created here. PR watch does not establish this manual run's outcome.

[HemSoft]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: ba684b7ee7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: 662e905ea1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: e7ea659967

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

Final old-run classification: iPad original-2 ran 8 journeys, 6 passed and 2 failed with no skips. Both selectors are the same repaired Grok omitted-zero fixtures: testGrokAndCursorMetersStaySeparateAndNoAllowanceIsUnavailable at old line 100, and testSavedGrokLayoutAndWeeklyStates at old line 392. Both hierarchies show unavailable usage and no weekly tile. The capped producer read retained 624,693 bytes. No distinct new fault was found in this fifth worker. Old run 40136984441 completed failure at 8:12:19 PM EDT, with 7 workers passed and 5 failed.

After clean source, exact remote head, clean Codex and successful SwiftLint were rechecked, one normal required full qualification run 40146062194 was dispatched at full head e7ea659 with ui_validation_mode=full. The accepted dispatch and one identity lookup verify this source. All five quality jobs, twelve workers, 53 journeys per family and preparation/reset remain required. This is in progress, not a pass or merge permission. The v2 relay is present; real bot delivery and exact Chief-thread wake remain unproven. No synthetic live comment, special relay dispatch, retry, polling loop, cancellation or old-history rewrite was used.

[github-actions]

Manual UI validation failed or is incomplete.

Run 40146062194, attempt 1 at head e7ea659967cac2e4cbf7fea4885379f1e7579576.
Source job. This is an event hint. Chief must verify GitHub API state.
The notifier runs before its own job and the workflow finish. This comment does not establish workflow completion or merge readiness.

• iOS UI journeys (ipad, native): not verified successful. https://github.com/hemsoft-dev/codexbar-ios/actions/runs/40146062194/job/121033727125

[HemSoft]

@codex review

Current head: b65417f9ba6178bd80febe8953e8ed4d466e06a9. Native readiness observer and failure-safe collector only; original predicate, static waiter, 30-second assertion, payment feedback and full workloads remain intact. Independent Codex/high review is clean. Eighty Python controls pass; full hosted qualification remains pending.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: b65417f9ba

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[github-actions]

Manual UI validation failed or is incomplete.

Run 40215906682, attempt 1 at head b65417f9ba6178bd80febe8953e8ed4d466e06a9.
Source job. This is an event hint. Chief must verify GitHub API state.
The notifier runs before its own job and the workflow finish. This comment does not establish workflow completion or merge readiness.

• iOS UI journeys (iphone, native): not verified successful. https://github.com/hemsoft-dev/codexbar-ios/actions/runs/40215906682/job/121245460790
• iOS UI journeys (ipad, native): not verified successful. https://github.com/hemsoft-dev/codexbar-ios/actions/runs/40215906682/job/121245460804

[HemSoft]

@codex review

Current head 91b8e826353b378de82b104c5833f6acf5e3fbb4. Repair the observed log-show date conversion failure, preserve exact phase filtering and Python3.9 timestamp support. Independent Codex/high review is clean;82Python controls pass. Consumer assertions/workloads/timeouts are unchanged. No additional full run dispatched.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: 91b8e82635

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

Cost comparison setup correction prepared

Public PR head remains 91b8e826353b378de82b104c5833f6acf5e3fbb4. A clean local commit 35cbb6f947b299248559a40c822d44a1f3660d23 adds an explicit manual cost-only mode; it is undergoing a fresh independent Codex/high review before publication/use. No new cost pair or full run has been dispatched.

The previous pair remains non-passing: baseline48s/43job-seconds on image20261021.0445.8 versus candidate49s/44 on20261013.0424.1. The first57s/54 observation and all older failures remain retained.

The prepared control checks actual image, default Xcode/Swift/OS build, architecture/CPU/memory, exact source ancestry and effective automatic workload before lint. Both measurements use the same frozen workflow/controller ref; the baseline checks out exact default-base d58713e, and the candidate keeps its own exact SHA. The candidate must match the successful baseline's toolchain/config fingerprint. Source identity is explicit so a baseline run at the controller SHA cannot be mistaken for current-head source validation. A mismatch refuses the workload, with no retry.

Acceptance still uses complete Actions workflow elapsed and summed non-skipped job runtime, including checkout, guards, source switching and setup/cleanup. No tolerance, phase-time substitution or deductions. One pair only after new-head review/ordinary CI and identity prerequisites; no repeated sampling until green.

Local evidence:97Python controls pass (11cost-only,4existing automatic policy,82observer/runner/shard), actionlint1.7.12 and diff checks pass. Effective automatic job matches the default-base; removing only the manual cost changes recovers the complete previous workflow byte-for-byte. No Swift/project/entitlement/journey-manifest changes. Automatic PR steps/workload remain checkoutdepth1, pinnedSwiftLint and four policy tests with the same ten-minute ceiling. Full/account-menu modes retain their workloads; cost-only mode skips all native/full jobs.

Full observer run40215906682, attempt1 atb65417f, is still completed FAILURE. It cannot qualify the changed source. All current-head connected review, required check, valid cost-pair and full/native requirements remain; no additional full dispatch is authorized here.

[HemSoft]

@codex review

Review current head bf5e2578c1caf58d49bbd41dd28e6444e5fce69d. Manual-only image/toolchain cost controls now materialize baseline and candidate from the same verified empty checkout state, fixing the independent review's baseline-preparation bias. Automatic PR workload and full-mode native/UI acceptance remain intact. No cost pair or full run has been dispatched.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: bf5e2578c1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

@codex review

Review exact current head 8befdb59cca29c8b73cd296a5a0a9697c5e5c53b. Cost-mode checkout now explicitly selects github.sha, fixing the independent review's branch-dispatch integration finding; ordinary checkout behavior is unchanged. The prior baseline-materialization bias is also repaired. No cost pair/full dispatch has occurred.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 8befdb59cc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

Controlled cost pair: baseline verified, candidate dispatched

The October 26 stall check found the baseline had already completed without a PR-watch wake. This separate dispatch is not reliably surfaced by the PR required-check rollup.

Baseline run 40263990934, attempt 1, passed on October 25 at 11:26:09 PM EDT. The immutable controller is 8befdb59cca29c8b73cd296a5a0a9697c5e5c53b; its receipt proves the measured source was default ancestor d58713e889fbfe3a025f0966cef5345099418e42. Complete run-start-to-last-job elapsed is 54 seconds, and summed non-skipped job runtime is 50 seconds. No setup/queue/cleanup deductions or tolerance. Only SwiftLint/policy executed; all native/UI modes were skipped.

Verified receipt: image 20261021.0445.8, Xcode 26.6 / 17F113, toolchain/config SHA256 37676db6b5939b58874241a3051acc228476a32e1c3e79c871ed9b61d902cba5, effective automatic-job hash d4f7ab2a374c30c540f9f68b449b61fb7ee4515ba8e50e874f3e84d39a0107cc. Common starting source is the candidate, with 563 candidate paths removed and zero index/worktree entries before baseline materialization. Controller hash matches the published helper.

After verifying the clean local checkout, exact remote branch/default SHAs, current clean Codex review, green required SwiftLint and no live branch workflow, dispatched the single authorized candidate half: run 40296407578, attempt 1, workflow/controller and intended measured source 8befdb59cca29c8b73cd296a5a0a9697c5e5c53b. It requires the baseline's exact image and toolchain/config hash before lint. Its first metadata read showed in progress, started October 26 at 5:01:28 AM EDT; no candidate receipt or timing pass is claimed yet.

Budget consumed: one baseline and one candidate dispatch, zero retries, zero new full/native dispatches. Acceptance still requires both complete timing measures not to increase, plus matching successful source/image/toolchain/preparation receipts. Historical adverse pairs remain retained. The prior full hosted run remains failed and does not qualify this head; skipped statuses do not satisfy native gates. No merge or full UI dispatch is authorized by this pending cost result.

Evidence: /tmp/codexbar-517-cost-detach-r3/ contains baseline API/jobs/log/identity, strict verification, measurements, candidate intent/result/initial metadata and the updated pair ledger. Current-head clean review is 6407337053. No new comments or formal review requests changed its result.

[HemSoft]

@codex review

Review current merge head cb9f1b03397ce1362973fcc56a57c98fc4fd10e6. Main f2ce58a30628ad11bd6e58cae0a3b76208466b55 is integrated without a rebase or force push. Resolved only CHANGELOG/UI-TESTING conflicts: retain both developer entries and the twelve-worker/53-journey instructions. Main's qualified native failure-capture test is inherited byte-for-byte. Workflow, phase/shard manifests, observer collector and cost-controller bytes remain identical to previous8befdb5. 149 focused Python tests and14offline relay tests pass; no extra cost/full/native dispatch. Prior failed cost/native evidence remains historical and does not qualify this new head.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: cb9f1b0339

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 4b9f1831f2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[HemSoft]

Merge-head evidence for 4b9f1831f2860eae391a74b6f8d41815febf04d5

Ownership moved to a Claude worker under the Chief's P0 override of October 27. The previous owner stood aside.

Main reconciliation. Main fc55494 (#525) was merged in with a normal merge commit. There was no rebase or force push. The only conflict was CHANGELOG.md Developer Experience, and both the #517 and #522 entries are kept. #525 touched no UI tests, scripts or workflow, so the shard and phase manifests are unchanged.

Local validation on air:

• build-for-testing with 0 warnings.
• CodexBarIOSTests: 1,184 tests, 0 failures.
• scripts.tests.test_function_risk and scripts.tests.test_pro_release_validation: 79 tests OK. This is the step that failed in main run 40313385205.
• Manual suites test_automatic_cost, test_native_observer and test_account_menu_comparison: OK.
• Relay tests: 14 of 14 Node tests pass.
• git diff --check is clean.

Review and checks. Codex review is clean for 4b9f183. Required SwiftLint passed in run 40501941750. There are 0 unresolved threads.

Automatic-CI cost. The trigger, job, matrix, retry and timeout for the automatic SwiftLint job are unchanged. On PR events, fetch-depth/ref evaluate to the defaults (1/'') and the cost step is skipped. These are completed ordinary PR runs, all on the same hosted image 20261021.618:

Run	Workflow	Elapsed	SwiftLint job
40446107396 (#525)	main	57s	53s
40344547287 (#524)	main	51s	47s
40501941750 (this head)	#521	42s	38s

The earlier guarded cost-mode pair (54s/50s versus 57s/52s) still counts as a failure. The table above is a separate comparison of ordinary runs.

Still open. Full iOS UI validation (5 quality jobs plus 12 workers) is a release gate under AGENTS.md, not a PR gate. It has not passed on this head. After merge, one manual full run on the main merge commit will qualify both this sharding and main CI.