docs(blog): publish testing-guidance null result - #59
Merged
Conversation
Git-Session-Id: d24e
Owner
Author
🤖 AI code reviewSafe to merge — no P0/P1 findingsConfidence 5/5 ✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass. Reviewed Maintainer commands
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Publish “Why my testing instructions stayed the same,” a report of a small testing-guidance pilot. The post explains the 7/12 versus 6/12 detection result, its dependence on one fixture, the failed per-family adoption rule, and the mismatch between the compact control and the intended full skill. It includes the generated Open Graph card.
Validation: independent factual review checked all 24 held-out receipts; scoped source/frontmatter checks, website commit hooks, and the full Jekyll/CSS build passed. Verified the rendered result table and Open Graph metadata and visually inspected the generated card. The post distinguishes repeated trials from distinct tasks and keeps sealed prompts and private workspace provenance out of the public artifact.