docs(blog): publish supply blindness vs drought - #48
Merged
Conversation
Git-Session-Id: b298
Git-Session-Id: b298
Owner
Author
🤖 AI code reviewSafe to merge — no P0/P1 findingsConfidence 5/5 ✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass. Reviewed Maintainer commands
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Publish the existing supply-blindness article at
/blog/work-supply-blindness-vs-drought/, restoring a destination already referenced by a newer post. The account distinguishes failed discovery, routing preferences, and delivered artifacts; an evidence review corrected unsupported duration and causal claims before publication.Validated with a full Jekyll build, commit hooks, independent editorial review, and a Chromium screenshot of the rendered page. The page displays its summary once. The generated OG image was visually checked. The pre-PR gate passed 100/100 with a 5/5 review, no findings, and 3/3 answering passes on
aecca86635efae63cb28f4e96a408018acfa0fe4.