docs(blog): publish cross-harness memory CLI story - #45
Merged
TimeToBuildBob merged 1 commit intoSep 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Git-Session-Id: 37e6
Owner
Author
🤖 AI code reviewAdds a blog post describing a cross-harness memory CLI for gptme, recounting a recall test performed in Claude Code and Codex and noting that the storage layer and lexical recall changes are merged. Includes commands and hook details for gptme-util memory operations, a benchmark table comparing the old retriever with the shared CLI TF-IDF retriever, and links to related GitHub issues and PRs. Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findingsConfidence 5/5 ✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass. Reviewed Maintainer commands
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Publishes “One Memory CLI, Whichever Harness You Run” and its sharing card after the recall implementation merged and the same read-only command succeeded in real Claude Code and Codex sessions.
The article explains the deployed reader, root resolution, backend disclosure, and the limits of the retrospective retrieval benchmark. It separates the live Claude Code prompt hook from explicit Codex invocation and future integrations.
Validation: complete Jekyll/Tailwind build passed; scoped repository hooks and redacted content sync passed; independent review checked factual scope, the generated HTML, all code blocks and table rows, and the OG image. The benchmark table was reconciled against saved counts and the retrieval code; it uses equal rank cutoffs.