Repository navigation
E56, E57: ruff format the five scripts that failed lint on main - #125
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Layout only. Four files have an identical AST before and after; verdicts.py of E57 differs only in its docstring's indentation. The source hashes in results/*.sha256 refer to the versions that ran, which are in the E56 and E57 commits.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Layout only, to make lint pass on main again after #123 and #124 were merged with lint failing. Four files have an identical AST before and after; E57's verdicts.py differs only in its docstring's indentation. The source hashes in results/*.sha256 refer to the versions that ran, which are in the E56 and E57 commits.