Repository navigation
Prove stable joint-bank Gram spectral obstruction (no new κ) - #6181
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 29, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove a scoped obstruction for the complete P104 Gram pair: one persistent Gaussian-dyadic invertible code cannot transform it to the spectral-projector pair with alpha*beta=169, even when the code mixes both banks and any finite number of identically restored dirty scratch coordinates. No new kappa is claimed.
The new block calculation gives ranks 1664, 128 and zero for F-I and its next two powers modulo 13. The correction bounds are sharp over F13. Exact dyadic attainment is open. Matrix rank is not a native-call tariff or a complete paid invoice.
This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Chris R / Clear1nsight's PR3979, at
a8a1d744811cd7d1f9c43ec7ccbae85ef9695b61, for the tensor-code model and the cited premises A²=13A, n=104 and rank(A mod13)=8. Its original code, invoice and proofs are not replayed or audited. The P104/native/caller lineage keeps its credit. Jordan classification and rank inequalities are classical.Evidence
Before, PR3979 explicitly left general bank mixing outside its obstruction. After, the complete-operator invariant excludes every common joint code and finite identity-restored stabilization in the stated ring.
Local CPython 3.12.15 on macOS arm64 passes:
From the worktree root:
A different CPython 3.12 executable can replace the local interpreter path. Expected markers are
PASS_P104_JOINT_SPECTRAL_OBSTRUCTION modular_repair=832 balanced=1664 no_new_kappa,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.Limits and unrun obligations
The quantified claim rests on PROOF.md and the cited Gram premises. Finite canonical-block corroboration is not a reconstruction of the predecessor's original matrix. One common endpoint code, the Gaussian-dyadic ring and identity return of the whole scratch space are essential. Distinct endpoint codes, interleaved new operations and changed targets remain outside the theorem.
No exact dyadic rank-832 correction, native realization, selected caller/compiler/precision/storage/tape/analytic replay, full multiplication theorem, independent human review or formal proof-kernel acceptance is claimed. No registered scientific command is left for CI alone. The selected frontier and frozen packages retain their bytes.
Open next questions
Can an exact Gaussian-dyadic correction attain rank 832? Begin with the n=2, r=1 integral example A=[[13,1],[0,0]] in the proof, one common dyadic-invertible code and a rank-two correction. A modular solution alone does not lift the endpoint. A physical construction must then price native access and complete restoration.
Related open work
No open PR was found on this exact two-stage spectral-normalization question. Related work has distinct contracts or quantities:
#6166 studies the P104 ternary decoding code; this proof concerns the complete Gram pair modulo 13.
#6173 studies two-channel support in that code; no support optimum is computed here.
#6171 reduces tensor-frame rank moments under fixed boundaries; it does not identify this dyadic spectral endpoint.
#6172 studies variable-target signed tensor moments in an abstract contact graph; no common invoice or numerical optimum is compared.
#6144 changes P104 owned-word trajectories; this package supplies no word edit or kappa comparison.
#6167 retains an operand to change another P104 root stop; no trajectory or kappa comparison is computed here.
#6169 resynthesizes P104 scalar events; this obstruction supplies no event or scalar-unit saving.
#6170 supplies P104 design tooling; no tool or predecessor checker is changed here.
#6175 localizes ADD-coefficient faults in P104 words; this package studies a different algebraic endpoint invariant.
#6178 bounds costs of functional decoder pairings over fields; its pairing alphabet is not the persistent joint-code contract here.
#6180 certifies rectangular dirty circuits; it does not compute this spectral correction rank.
#6183 studies real contractive approximation of the P104 Gram channel; this exact Gaussian-dyadic conjugacy and correction-rank obstruction computes a different quantity. No approximation optimum is computed here.
The finish-line refresh checked this account's open PRs created since the CLAIM and added #6183 as new related Gram-channel work. The two results compute different quantities, so no numerical agreement or disagreement is asserted. No extra computations were run to validate these other contributions. Advance claim. Canonical main remained
3f0152a32eeebac0df11946dbd50cabe5a7f7839at the submission refresh.CI notes
Both hosted checks passed at
65704df0ff4e7cad336694d39ff3492df48e0c04:planandreplay (research/p104-joint-spectral-obstruction), in run 40881221129. The checks were read once at completion; run metadata confirms this exact head and a completed, successful conclusion. Hosted CI certifies execution of the registered finite checks and metadata gate. Independent scientific review and the exact dyadic/physical obligations above remain unclaimed.Merge danger
Door: two-way. One isolated research package can be reverted independently.
Blast radius: research. The package adds a scoped theorem and opt-in replay.