Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped algebraic proof with finite corroboration. For every pair of distinct left cosets of PR3828's 4080-owner centre subgroup, the full scalar common-observation kernel consists of exactly the two inherited constant triple directions.
Here j counts the complete cosets retained in A. On two full blocks the derived minimum is 848638. Pairing these blocks creates no additional hidden direction and leaves the information-compression density unchanged. This settles the two-coset case of Open next question 1 in PR3828, rather than auditing its result. No new kappa or selected-frontier change.
The proof uses output-class separation, including arbitrary partial intersections of translated outgoing sets, without assuming subgroup normality. The new source check establishes that exactly columns 0,6,85 lie in the distinguished triple plane. Single-block coset classification, subgroup order, reader rank and pairwise column independence remain explicitly cited predecessor premises.
Produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Chris R / Clear1nsight #3828, Ross Richardson #3797/#3071, Matarener #3656, Sagar Thakrar #3291, and their retained geometry/native/compiler lineage. No predecessor verifier is replayed or edited.
Evidence
After: PROOF.md gives the universal two-coset theorem and exact subblock information formula.
From the repository root:
Any CPython 3.12 executable can replace the local interpreter path. Expected markers are PASS_CENTRE_TWO_COSET_SEPARATION, PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE and PASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.
Limitations
This is the historical calls-0/4 scalar whole-later-query model. The source order supplies the derived 8160-owner observation count; the large source matrix is not re-eliminated. Predecessor group/coset/rank certificates are cited dependencies, not newly independently accepted results.
Physical source acquisition, dirty restoration, native realization, storage, precision, recursive pricing, compiler and outer obligations remain open. This supplies no current P104 replacement, paid-call saving or complete multiplication theorem. The five selected framework assumptions remain. Lean, Docker and the selected cold replay were not run. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Open next questions
Can three distinct left cosets create mixed kernel directions? Three singleton columns can be dependent at one output, so this proof stops at two blocks. First specify an actual three-coset incidence and its coefficient compatibility. A physical extension still needs a legal consumer and a complete paid/productive invoice.
Related open work
The completion refresh checked the seven other account PRs opened since the advance CLAIM: #6121, #6122 and #6124 through #6128. They study THREE-base precision, higher-rank query shears, paired samplers, Gaussian row bounds and direct-flow leaf laws. None studies this two-coset centre-block kernel or its extra-linear-observation minimum. No same-instance numerical disagreement was found; no additional mathematical replay was performed for comparison.
No other open PR studying this exact object or quantity was identified in the earlier refreshed open-PR corpus and targeted live searches. #3828, #3797 and #3656 are merged cited predecessors. Searches do not cover unpublished work or every diff.
Canonical advance CLAIM. The delivered scope matches its predicted two-coset exclusion. Canonical main was refreshed at publication and remained 721c038.
CI notes
Uncertified by CI. At head 4cb8e99, run 40692336750 failed its plan job in the onboarding helper tests. The package replay was skipped and did not run in CI.
The failure comes from the current main baseline 721c038, the PR6030 kappa admission pushed with a skip-ci marker. Its selected record and onboarding documentation do not satisfy two existing synchronization tests:
The same two failures are present in PR #6120's run 40691776027; both failed-job logs were inspected. Neither failing document is changed by this package. The completed checks were read once. No push, main-document fix or workflow re-run was performed.
All listed local package, direct normal/optimized, committed-byte/history and export checks passed. They do not replace hosted certification. This PR needs a maintainer re-run after main is fixed. No hosted scientific replay or independent scientific acceptance is claimed.
Merge danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: isolated research package. No shared code, frozen source, selected frontier or other contribution changes.