Repository navigation
Verify the L300/L301 fixed-cut shared-handoff obstruction (no new κ) - #5546
Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
HANDOFF — actual L19/L300/L301 shared-crossing qualification (no new κ) Research discussion / PR / artifact: Source-bound follow-up to #5472. Public replay/proof package: shared-crossing-cut9047-20261025. This is a scoped negative result, not a new supplier or frontier claim. Exact commit: Artifact What is established: L300/L301 read the same L19 historical value at forward events 9045/9047, frame 21. At the ORIGINAL unmodified cut, the only coframed owners are L19/L300/L301. Pure e300/e301 are outside their rational scalar span, even with two independent successors. Exact witnesses What remains uncertain: Earlier prefix rewrites, changed helper bases, other cuts/anchors, operator-valued ordinary recoding, new transports or larger shared words. Witness admissibility in a different caller's restricted/owned input domain was not checked. Full suffix/owned return, phases/raw inverse transpose, changed relations, complete caller costs and compiler/outer funding remain open. No complete profile gain, κ ceiling or funded κ is established; the local matched re-flag identity is not promoted to a universal shared-cost barrier. Smallest useful next task: After checking current contributor scope, specify one literal prefix/basis rewrite or relocated-anchor recipe that changes the exact witness conditions, with all input/target/cost transfers and one bounded falsifier. A novel unproved paper recipe is eligible; a successful upstream construction is not a prerequisite. Repeating unchanged scalar purification at this cut with more samples or coefficients cannot defeat the exact span result. Our round stopped; no ongoing claim on such a redesign is made. Reproduction command and expected runtime: Python 3.12/stdlib, from repository root: Predecessor credit: Cao Yifan/#4610; zxv/productive helpers/native rules; GamingPuzzled/Joel Pulikkan/#5472; Cinna Davis; Matarener; aliromman/#5383 and later audits; Dillon Amburgey; Clear1nsight/Chris R and the retained provider/completion/controller lineage. Substantial OpenAI Codex assistance (Astra design, separate Sol checker/physical/invoice/custody/execution roles); new material Apache-2.0. {
"schema": "integer-mult-coordination/v1",
"kind": "HANDOFF",
"task": "complex-new-helper-inventory",
"scope": "Original-prefix L19/L300/L301 cut9047 frame21 rational-scalar purification obstruction and retained-anchor restriction; no new kappa",
"base": "32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d04",
"expiry": null,
"artifact": "https://github.com/Clear1nsight/integer-mult-bounds/tree/d91b568b54bba63f1c15a34560afb78b0c7b02cf/research/shared-crossing-cut9047-20261025"
} |
Change and mathematical scope
Adds one opt-in research package,
research/shared-crossing-cut9047-20261025/, proving and replaying a scoped obstruction to an original shared-helper hand-off proposal. No new physical word, paid-profile gain, κ ceiling or funded κ is claimed.The actual L300/L301 helpers read the same L19 historical value at forward events 9045/9047, frame 21. At the original unmodified cut, the complete coframed inventory is L19/L300/L301. Neither pure original helper input is in their rational scalar span, even with two arbitrary independent successors and zero scratch. Two exact input variations witness this:
(L300=u,L505=-4u)and(L301=u,L226=u)preserve every available row but change the required pure output. A separate retained-anchor intersection argument leaves only the existing frame 21 in the chosen first window.The result does not exclude an earlier prefix rewrite, changed helper basis, other cuts/anchors, operator-valued ordinary recoding, new transport or a larger shared word. Witness admissibility under a different caller's restricted/owned input domain is unproved. Protected suffixes, owned returns, phases/raw dual, complete caller and compiler/outer funding remain open. The tentative
2H1+2H8-2H9reward is unadmitted for this rejected immediate-purification premise.Task and overlap
User-assigned scope key:
shared-crossing-L19-L300-L301-cut9047. Catalogue provenance:complex-new-helper-inventory, changed scope / negative-result; the original card's positive complete-supplier acceptance gate is expressly not claimed met. This isolates a necessary physical implication before further construction.Base is canonical
CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds:main, commit32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d04. Native source Git blob/SHA-256 and exact catalogue/selected provenance are inSOURCES.json. No pending-PR code is imported or required by replay.Nearest work: #5472 (
f560065151f924838a80ac720fb4c55c6ffc0201), successor hand-off and local re-flag neutrality; #5541, actual-word balanced-J verification with coded-main restrictions; Discussion #5470/#5489, released helper300 transport scope. This tests a genuine two-helper slice and dirty-input separation, rather than repeating a gain-only tariff or padding a baseline. Visible handoff/proposal Discussions and relevant PRs were checked; hidden/cache/unpublished coverage remains incomplete, so no novelty/exclusivity claim. Paused peer scopes were preserved and not resumed.Validation
Python 3.12, standard library only:
f5c45a13239ea521140920c016e2436195580f78112a45240adaba314041cd12; complete output70a30ac467a8d9a2b15e54d88b519258ef5bfff98fed11832a208c31c4fd0c81.No full new-word, phase/raw-dual/caller/compiler/outer replay was run. Hosted CI and scientific/maintainer acceptance remain separate from these local checks.
Credit
Cao Yifan/#4610; zxv/productive helpers and native semantics; GamingPuzzled/Joel Pulikkan/#5472; Cinna Davis/scalar semantics; Matarener/scoped boundaries; aliromman/#5383 owned relations and later audits; Dillon Amburgey and Clear1nsight/Chris R/provider-completion and #5413 lineage, with further predecessors retained in package references.
Prepared by Chris R (Clear1nsight) with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance: GPT-6-astra/xhigh paper design; GPT-6.1-sol/high event extraction, independent checker/physical and invoice review, custody and guarded execution. Agent independence is not independent human or formal admission. New material is Apache-2.0; the native input is not copied or modified.
Open next questions
See structured questions in
TASK.jsonand the seven-fieldHANDOFF.md:The round stopped after this one result. This submission does not start another search, change the selected frontier or authorize merging.