Skip to content

Share FastLanes compare kernels between operators and signedness - #10739

Open
robert3005 wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
rk/size-fastlanes-compare-negate
Open

robert3005 wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
rk/size-fastlanes-compare-negate

Compare signed bit-packed values with unsigned kernels

18aaeeb
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Oct 23, 2026 in 0s

1 benchmark regressed

4 warnings, 1 note

⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliable

Some benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ Unable to measure the execution of 1 benchmark

This benchmark measured no execution time, so its result is not comparable and counts as unchanged. This usually happens when the compiler removes the code under test.

Prevent compiler optimizations

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 17 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ Base and head ran on different runner types

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runner types, so the changes might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type, or use CodSpeed Macro Runners for more stable results.

Learn more about Macro Runners

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

ℹ️ 40 benchmarks have no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: the symbols of the profiling trace could not be resolved, because no information about the language frames was collected.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 19 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 2388 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 12 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ CPU Simulation test_scan_filter[int] 3.2 ms 3.6 ms -12.67%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[33] 505.5 µs 448.8 µs +12.63%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[34] 506.6 µs 450.9 µs +12.35%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[36] 515 µs 459.6 µs +12.05%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[35] 520.6 µs 465 µs +11.95%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[31] 484.4 µs 433.1 µs +11.85%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[30] 468.6 µs 419.4 µs +11.73%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[29] 464.6 µs 416.1 µs +11.66%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[28] 439 µs 393.8 µs +11.48%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[38] 538.1 µs 483 µs +11.42%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[37] 534.9 µs 481.1 µs +11.19%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[39] 552.6 µs 497.8 µs +11.01%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[27] 442.9 µs 400 µs +10.73%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[42] 569.6 µs 514.9 µs +10.62%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[26] 428.1 µs 387.1 µs +10.61%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[25] 424.1 µs 383.7 µs +10.54%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[44] 577.6 µs 523.2 µs +10.39%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[41] 567.3 µs 514.1 µs +10.33%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[43] 584.8 µs 530.5 µs +10.25%
⚡ CPU Simulation compare[46] 602.8 µs 546.9 µs +10.23%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing rk/size-fastlanes-compare-negate (18aaeeb) with develop (32390c0)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩