Skip to content

DOCS-2594 / 27 / DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev#4635

Open
DjP-iX wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev
Open

DOCS-2594 / 27 / DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev#4635
DjP-iX wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev

Conversation

@DjP-iX

@DjP-iX DjP-iX commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

static/includes/FusionPoolsCommonContent.md:

  • Removed the false implication that hot spares add fault tolerance to Metadata VDEVs (line 4).
  • Replaced the "share hot spares" / "provide hot spares for that drive type" guidance with the actual rule: hot spares
    activate only in data VDEVs, so the special VDEV must have its own internal redundancy. Kept the pool-corruption
    consequence and the drive-type-choice point (lines 11-12).

Thanks for contributing to TrueNAS documentation! By opening a Pull Request, you're acknowledging that your changes will be distributed under the Creative Commons 4.0 license.

@DjP-iX DjP-iX requested a review from a team as a code owner June 16, 2026 16:35
@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev DOCS-2594 / 27 / DOCS-2594-correct-fusion-pools-content-to-indicate-spares-only-allocate-to-data-vdev Jun 16, 2026
@bugclerk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Vale Style Guide Issues (Previous - Click to expand)

Vale Style Guide Issues

📊 Summary: 16 issues found in changed files - 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 suggestions

Changed files with issues:

static/includes/FusionPoolsCommonContent.md (16 issues)

  • Lines 4, 16, 19, 21 - suggestion: Use active voice instead of passive voice
  • Line 8 - suggestion: Spell out 'UPS' on first use
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Keep sentences under 30 words
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Spell out 'RAIDZ' on first use

🔧 To fix: Review the issues above and update your documentation accordingly.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Vale Style Guide Issues (Previous - Click to expand)

Vale Style Guide Issues

📊 Summary: 16 issues found in changed files - 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 suggestions

Changed files with issues:

static/includes/FusionPoolsCommonContent.md (16 issues)

  • Lines 4, 16, 19, 21 - suggestion: Use active voice instead of passive voice
  • Line 8 - suggestion: Spell out 'UPS' on first use
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Keep sentences under 30 words
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Spell out 'RAIDZ' on first use

🔧 To fix: Review the issues above and update your documentation accordingly.

@micjohnson777 micjohnson777 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Metadata is now call Special so this needs to be updated to reflect that change in 26.

@micjohnson777 micjohnson777 added the Technical Writer Review (MJ) A technical writer is reviewing the PR. label Jun 17, 2026
@DjP-iX

DjP-iX commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Metadata is now call Special so this needs to be updated to reflect that change in 26.

That's not what I'm seeing in BETA.2?

image

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Vale Style Guide Issues

📊 Summary: 16 issues found in changed files - 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 suggestions

Changed files with issues:

static/includes/FusionPoolsCommonContent.md (16 issues)

  • Lines 4, 16, 19, 21 - suggestion: Use active voice instead of passive voice
  • Line 8 - suggestion: Spell out 'UPS' on first use
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Keep sentences under 30 words
  • Line 16 - suggestion: Spell out 'RAIDZ' on first use

🔧 To fix: Review the issues above and update your documentation accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-26 Re-Review Technical Writer Review (MJ) A technical writer is reviewing the PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants