Complete governed proposal living-graph cutover - #393
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Outcome
Aligns API execution planning with the canonical governed content and living-graph contracts so structurally complete proposals enter review while unresolved authority and question conditions remain explicit graph gates.
Work authority
Contributor mode (select one):
Plan
Use one proposal-to-graph path, preserve TreeDX as content authority, enforce exact dependency and workspace custody, and verify focused graph behavior before the golden campaign.
Changes and commits
Verification
Local full API suite: 244 files and 1,100 tests passed; 13 files and 19 tests skipped by design.
Focused draft graph readiness: 2 passed after the move.
File architecture policy passed locally.
SDK 0.13.0-rc.122 and Deployment 0.1.0-rc.321 compatibility passed in that full gate.
I ran the narrowest relevant package verification and documented any checks that could not be run.
Risk and rollback
Risk is limited to the pre-acceptance graph/content contract. Roll back by reverting the commits in this PR before any accepted golden workday is created; no production data migration is included.
Completion summary
Localized API graph behavior is implemented and locally verified against the exact published SDK and Deployment contracts. Hosted verification is the remaining merge gate.
AGPL committer authorization
The base-owned workflow checks the provider-authenticated pull-request author against .github/approved-committers.json. There is no per-PR grant checkbox.
Submission checklist