Skip to content

docs(site): Mon SEO — registry model rights + deprecated/revoked Q&As - #143

Merged
enricopiovesan merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/registry-lifecycle-rights-qa
Oct 5, 2026
Merged

enricopiovesan merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/registry-lifecycle-rights-qa

Conversation

@enricopiovesan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Two SEO Q&As for the registry spec 026 work that landed last week:

  • /questions/does-the-registry-record-model-rights.html
  • /questions/what-happens-when-a-capability-version-is-revoked.html

Grounded in registry spec 005 (FR-004), spec 026 v1.1.0 (contract signature over committed bytes), and decision-log entry 127 Q11. Open work stated plainly: traverse#1598, registry#631, registry#623. No new product claims; Traverse-side enforcement is marked not shipped.

Wired into the questions hub, llms.txt, and relatedLinks on the attribution, contract-versioning, and capability-registry pages.

…ed lifecycle Q&As

Two honest Q&As grounded in registry spec 005, spec 026 v1.1.0 and decision-log
entry 127: what the model rights record declares (signed declaration, not legal
certification) and how deprecated/revoked versions behave for ranges vs exact
pins. States open work plainly: traverse#1598 (CLI/runtime), registry#631 (crate
exact-pin alignment + publish), registry#623 (agent backfill). Wire hub,
llms.txt and relatedLinks.
@enricopiovesan
enricopiovesan merged commit 87ced9f into main Oct 5, 2026
5 checks passed
@enricopiovesan
enricopiovesan deleted the docs/registry-lifecycle-rights-qa branch October 5, 2026 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant