Improve C28 upper bound to 63#84
Open
maaxgrin wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR records a construction of a counterexample to Borsuk's conjecture in dimension$63$ . Equivalently, it improves the recorded upper bound for $C_{28}$ from
to
The construction starts from the standard$G_2(4)$ Euclidean representation used in the Bondarenko and Jenrich--Brouwer constructions. The new step is to remove a structured set of $96$ points so that the remaining $320$ points lie in a $63$ -dimensional subspace, then adjoin one projected point while preserving the clique obstruction: every subset of smaller diameter has size at most $5$ .
The proof PDF, verification script, exported DIMACS certificates, and optional Sage verification of the exported certificates are available here:
https://github.com/maaxgrin/borsuk-63-counterexample
The construction and proof were obtained with assistance from GPT-5.5 Pro.