Skip to content

Solved Array-2#1879

Open
vvkumaryadla wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
vvkumaryadla:Array-2
Open

Solved Array-2#1879
vvkumaryadla wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
vvkumaryadla:Array-2

Conversation

@vvkumaryadla

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Solved Array-2

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Disappeared Numbers (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • Correctly implements the O(n) time and O(1) space solution using in-place marking
  • Properly handles potential negative values with Math.abs()
  • Includes restoration of the original array (good practice for not mutating input)
  • Clear comments explaining the algorithm logic
  • Good variable naming and code structure

Areas for Improvement:

  • The third loop to restore the array is technically unnecessary since the problem doesn't require preserving the input array, but it's good defensive programming
  • Could add input validation for edge cases (though constraints guarantee valid input)
  • The comment could be slightly clearer about why we use negative marking

Comparison to Reference:

  • The student's solution is significantly better than the reference O(n²) brute force solution
  • Student achieves O(n) time complexity vs O(n²) in reference
  • Both achieve O(1) auxiliary space complexity

VERDICT: PASS


max and min (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Correctly implements the pairwise comparison technique
  • Clear and informative comments explaining the algorithm and comparison counts
  • Good variable naming and code organization
  • Handles edge cases (empty array would be an issue, but the problem implies N≥1)
  • Efficient with O(n) time and O(1) space complexity

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution doesn't handle the edge case of an empty array (would throw ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException)
  • For even-length arrays, initializing min and max by comparing the first pair (like the reference solution) could save comparisons in the loop
  • The return type (ArrayList) differs from the reference solution (int[]), though both are valid approaches

VERDICT: PASS


Life Game (Problem3.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean separation of concerns with a dedicated helper method getLiveCellCount()
  • Clear comments explaining the temporary values (2 and 3)
  • Good variable naming (e.g., liveCellCount, totalRows, totalColumns)
  • Correctly handles boundary conditions
  • Properly counts neighbors including cells marked with temporary values

Areas for Improvement:

  • The dirs array could be declared as a static final class constant to avoid recreating it for each cell (though Java may optimize this)
  • Consider combining the two final passes into one loop for slightly better performance
  • The method signature could use int[][] board without the redundant m and n parameters since they can be derived from the board array

Overall, this is a solid solution that correctly implements the Game of Life in-place algorithm.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants