fix(security): require auth on printer detail GET and job retry

backend/app/api/routes/jobs.py

@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ async def cancel_job(
 async def pause_job(
     job_id: UUID,
     session: SessionDep,
+    _auth: PrintAuthDep,
 ) -> ProblemDetail:
     """Return 501 — pause is not yet implemented."""
     # Verify the job exists so we return 404 rather than 501 for unknown jobs
@@ -241,6 +242,7 @@ async def pause_job(
 async def resume_job(
     job_id: UUID,
     session: SessionDep,
+    _auth: PrintAuthDep,
 ) -> ProblemDetail:
     """Return 501 — resume is not yet implemented."""
     # Verify the job exists so we return 404 rather than 501 for unknown jobs
@@ -276,6 +278,7 @@ async def resume_job(
 async def retry_job(
     job_id: UUID,
     session: SessionDep,
+    _auth: PrintAuthDep,
 ) -> JobRead:
     """Clone a terminal job into a fresh QUEUED job."""
     job = await _get_job_or_404(session, job_id)

backend/app/api/routes/printers.py

@@ -143,9 +143,12 @@ async def list_printers(
 async def get_printer(
     printer_id: UUID,
     session: SessionDep,
+    _auth: ReadAuthDep,
 ) -> PrinterRead:
     """Return full printer metadata for a single printer."""
     printer = await _get_printer_or_404(session, printer_id)
+    if _auth is not None:
+        check_printer_access(_auth, printer_id)
     state = await printer_state_repo.get(session, printer_id)
     return PrinterRead(
         id=printer.id,

backend/tests/integration/api/test_auth_wiring.py

@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@
 
 Phase 1k.1a (Task 25): Removed TemplateLoader and /api/templates tests.
 Templates are deleted in Phase 1k.1a.
+
+2026-08-14 security audit: added coverage for GET /api/printers/{id} and
+POST /api/jobs/{id}/retry, which shipped with NO auth dependency at all
+while their sibling endpoints in the same router file all required one
+(see tests/unit/api/test_route_auth_coverage_guardrail.py for the
+structural guardrail that now catches this class of gap for every route,
+not just these two).
 """
 
 from __future__ import annotations
@@ -119,3 +126,118 @@ async def test_pangolin_sso_header_grants_read(api_client_with_seed):
         headers={"X-Pangolin-User": "testuser@example.com"},
     )
     assert resp.status_code == 200, f"SSO should grant read: {resp.status_code}"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 2026-08-14 security audit regressions:
+# GET /api/printers/{id} and POST /api/jobs/{id}/retry had NO auth
+# dependency at all — any caller that could reach the backend got full
+# printer connection metadata / could trigger a real reprint with zero
+# credentials. See app/api/routes/printers.py::get_printer and
+# app/api/routes/jobs.py::retry_job.
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+async def _seed_printer(factory):
+    from app.models.printer import Printer
+
+    async with factory() as s:
+        printer = Printer(
+            name="audit-seed-printer",
+            slug="audit-seed-printer",
+            model="PT-P750W",
+            backend="ptouch",
+            connection={"host": "192.0.2.10", "port": 9100},
+        )
+        s.add(printer)
+        await s.commit()
+        await s.refresh(printer)
+        return printer
+
+
+async def _seed_failed_job(factory, printer_id):
+    from app.models.job import Job, JobState
+
+    async with factory() as s:
+        job = Job(
+            printer_id=printer_id,
+            template_key="audit-seed-template",
+            state=JobState.FAILED.value,
+            payload={"text": "audit"},
+        )
+        s.add(job)
+        await s.commit()
+        await s.refresh(job)
+        return job
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_get_printer_detail_without_auth_returns_401(api_client_with_seed):
+    """GET /api/printers/{id} must reject unauthenticated requests.
+
+    Regression test: this endpoint previously had no auth dependency at
+    all, unlike GET /api/printers (list) and every other single-printer
+    endpoint (status/tape/queue/pause/resume) in the same file.
+    """
+    import app.db.engine as _engine_module
+
+    printer = await _seed_printer(_engine_module.async_session)
+
+    resp = await api_client_with_seed.get(f"/api/printers/{printer.id}")
+    assert resp.status_code == 401, f"Expected 401, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_get_printer_detail_with_read_key_returns_200(api_client_with_seed):
+    """GET /api/printers/{id} succeeds for a caller with a valid read-scope key."""
+    import app.db.engine as _engine_module
+
+    factory = _engine_module.async_session
+    printer = await _seed_printer(factory)
+    read_key = await _make_read_key(factory)
+
+    resp = await api_client_with_seed.get(
+        f"/api/printers/{printer.id}",
+        headers={"X-Label-Hub-Key": read_key},
+    )
+    assert resp.status_code == 200, f"Expected 200, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
+    assert resp.json()["id"] == str(printer.id)
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_retry_job_without_auth_returns_401(api_client_with_seed):
+    """POST /api/jobs/{id}/retry must reject unauthenticated requests.
+
+    Regression test: this endpoint previously had no auth dependency at
+    all, unlike list_jobs/get_job (read scope) and cancel_job (print scope)
+    in the same file — despite retry_job creating a new QUEUED job that the
+    worker actually dispatches to the physical printer.
+    """
+    import app.db.engine as _engine_module
+
+    factory = _engine_module.async_session
+    printer = await _seed_printer(factory)
+    job = await _seed_failed_job(factory, printer.id)
+
+    resp = await api_client_with_seed.post(f"/api/jobs/{job.id}/retry")
+    assert resp.status_code == 401, f"Expected 401, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_retry_job_with_print_key_returns_201(api_client_with_seed):
+    """POST /api/jobs/{id}/retry succeeds for a caller with a valid print-scope key."""
+    import app.db.engine as _engine_module
+
+    factory = _engine_module.async_session
+    printer = await _seed_printer(factory)
+    job = await _seed_failed_job(factory, printer.id)
+    print_key = await _make_print_key(factory)
+
+    resp = await api_client_with_seed.post(
+        f"/api/jobs/{job.id}/retry",
+        headers={"X-Label-Hub-Key": print_key},
+    )
+    assert resp.status_code == 201, f"Expected 201, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
+    body = resp.json()
+    assert body["id"] != str(job.id)
+    assert body["state"] == "queued"

backend/tests/integration/api/test_printer_acl.py

@@ -117,3 +117,54 @@ async def test_key_restricted_to_printer_a_allowed_on_printer_a(api_client_with_
     assert resp.status_code in (204, 404), (
         f"Expected 204 or 404, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
     )
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_get_printer_detail_restricted_to_printer_a_blocked_on_printer_b(
+    api_client_with_seed,
+):
+    """2026-08-14 follow-up: GET /api/printers/{id} (single-printer detail)
+    now requires auth but was missing the per-printer ACL check that every
+    sibling endpoint (get_printer_status/pause_printer/resume_printer/
+    clear_printer_queue) enforces via check_printer_access(). A read-key
+    scoped to printer A must not be able to read printer B's metadata
+    (including its connection dict — host/port/SNMP config).
+
+    Analogous to test_key_restricted_to_printer_a_blocked_on_printer_b above,
+    but seeds its own printer B directly instead of relying on
+    api_client_with_seed's (frequently empty, skip-on-empty) default seed
+    data — this test must actually run, not skip, to be a real regression
+    guard.
+    """
+    import app.db.engine as _engine_module
+    from app.models.printer import Printer
+
+    factory = _engine_module.async_session
+
+    async with factory() as s:
+        printer_b = Printer(
+            name="acl-test-printer-b",
+            slug="acl-test-printer-b",
+            model="PT-P750W",
+            backend="ptouch",
+            connection={"host": "192.0.2.20", "port": 9100},
+        )
+        s.add(printer_b)
+        await s.commit()
+        await s.refresh(printer_b)
+
+    printer_a_id = str(uuid4())  # some other printer the key IS allowed for
+
+    plaintext = await _insert_restricted_key(
+        factory,
+        allowed_printer_ids=[printer_a_id],
+        scopes=["read"],
+    )
+
+    resp = await api_client_with_seed.get(
+        f"/api/printers/{printer_b.id}",
+        headers={"X-Label-Hub-Key": plaintext},
+    )
+    assert resp.status_code == 403, (
+        f"Expected 403 for restricted key on wrong printer, got {resp.status_code}: {resp.text}"
+    )

backend/tests/unit/api/test_jobs_routes.py

@@ -545,7 +545,8 @@ async def test_retry_job_direct_returns_new_queued_job(session) -> None:
     printer = await _make_printer(session)
     original = await _make_job(session, printer.id, state=JobState.FAILED.value)
 
-    result = await retry_job(job_id=original.id, session=session)
+    fake_auth = AuthContext(source="api-key", scope="admin", api_key_id=_uuid4(), ip="127.0.0.1")
+    result = await retry_job(job_id=original.id, session=session, _auth=fake_auth)
 
     assert str(result.id) != str(original.id)
     assert result.state == JobState.QUEUED.value