test: migrate constants/float32/pi-squared to ULP-based assertions

[kgryte]

Resolves a part of #11352.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• migrates the test suite for constants/float32/pi-squared from a relative tolerance assertion to a ULP difference assertion.

The export equals π² test previously computed delta = absf( FLOAT32_PI_SQUARED - v ) and tol = EPS * v and asserted with t.ok( delta <= tol, ... ). It now delegates to @stdlib/number/float32/base/assert/is-almost-same-value:

tape( 'export equals π²', function test( t ) {
	var v;

	v = float64ToFloat32( pow( PI, 2 ) );

	t.strictEqual( isAlmostSameValue( v, FLOAT32_PI_SQUARED, 1 ), true, 'returns expected value' );

	t.end();
});

Final ULP constant: 1.

File	Call sites	ULP bound
test/test.js	1	1

Notes on how the bound was measured:

• The bound was tightened empirically by probing isAlmostSameValue( v, FLOAT32_PI_SQUARED, n ) for n = 0..8. n = 0 fails and n = 1 is the smallest value which passes, so 1 is the measured minimum.
• The computed value is float64ToFloat32( pow( PI, 2 ) ) = 9.86960506439209, while the exported constant is 9.869604110717773, i.e., the two differ by exactly one single-precision ULP. The single-precision variant of the assertion is used here (matching the already-converted constants/float32/ln-two-pi, constants/float32/ln-ten, and constants/float32/half-ln-two) so that the ULP gap is measured in single-precision units.
• The suite was run twice at the final bound to confirm determinism; all 4 assertions pass both times.
• This package has no test.native.js, so there is no JS/C divergence to account for.
• The two pre-existing exact assertions (typeof and the exact 9.869604110717773 value check) are intentionally left unchanged, as exact comparisons remain correct there.
• Only the one test file is modified; no source, documentation, or fixture changes.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Migrate math/base/special packages from relative tolerance testing to ULP difference testing (tracking issue) #11352

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

The bound is reproducible across architectures: the comparison is between two compile-time-fixed single-precision values and is not subject to FMA-contraction differences.

Note that the local make pre-commit EditorConfig check could not run in this environment (the editorconfig-checker binary download is network-blocked), so the changed file was verified manually for tabs-only indentation, no trailing whitespace, LF endings, and a final newline. make eslint-tests and make test for this package both pass.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was authored by Claude Code. It studied the already-converted packages in the same family (notably constants/float32/ln-two-pi and constants/float64/ln-two-pi) to match the established idiom, then measured the minimum ULP bound empirically and verified determinism as described above.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01RWwXztzfFcS6UC8AYLZenG

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
constants/float32/pi-squared	$\\color{green}52/52$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}1/1$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}52/52$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.