docs: fix typo

[Planeshifter]

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request normalizes two drifted documentation comments in the @stdlib/stats/base/dists/geometric namespace to the form shared by the majority of sibling packages. Both changes are documentation-only; no runtime behavior, public signature, or test expectation is affected.

stats/base/dists/geometric/mgf

The lib/index.js @module summary used an imperative form — "Evaluate the moment-generating function (MGF) for a geometric distribution." — diverging from the noun-phrase template used by every other function package in the namespace (e.g. "Geometric distribution variance."). Normalized to "Geometric distribution moment-generating function (MGF).", which already matches the package's own package.json description and README intro. Conformance: 13/14 (93%).

stats/base/dists/geometric/variance

The src/main.c docblock misspelled the p parameter description as "success probablity". Corrected to "success probability", matching the sibling C implementations. The compiled routine is untouched. Conformance: 7/8 (88%).

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Both deviations were surfaced by a cross-package majority-vote drift scan of the namespace's 15 members. Features whose deviations reflect genuine mathematical differences (inclusive vs. exclusive parameter bounds; one-argument moment functions vs. two-argument point-evaluated functions) and features without a ≥75% majority were deliberately excluded; only mechanical, behavior-preserving documentation drift is included here. The constructor (ctor) and the stdev Python test fixtures were likewise left untouched as intentional. The variance typo was previously noted and deferred as a spelling-defect class in #14138.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance.

This PR was authored by Claude Code running a scheduled cross-package API drift-detection routine over the @stdlib/stats/base/dists/geometric namespace. The routine extracted structural and semantic features from all 15 members, computed the per-feature majority pattern (≥75% threshold), and flagged the two documentation comments deviating from the sibling-majority form. Each finding was independently verified against the sibling packages and the deviating package's own metadata before inclusion; findings requiring behavior or test changes were excluded.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7tEqscBSpkPWzct2FAaE5

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/dists/geometric/variance	$\\color{green}165/165$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}9/9$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{green}165/165$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.