Skip to content

Office Hours (2026-01-13) #72

Closed
Closed

Description

@kgryte

🌟 Join Us for Weekly Office Hours! 🌟

Have questions about stdlib? Need help fixing a bug, figuring out what to do next, or just looking for feedback? Join our weekly office hours to connect with project maintainers, stay updated on the latest project news, and chat with other community members. This is a great opportunity to ask questions, share ideas, and engage directly with the stdlib team.

Everyone is welcome—drop in and say hello!

Time

UTC Tue 13-Jan-2026 17:30 (05:30 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Tue 13-Jan-2026 09:30 (09:30 AM)
US / Mountain Tue 13-Jan-2026 10:30 (10:30 AM)
US / Central Tue 13-Jan-2026 11:30 (11:30 AM)
US / Eastern Tue 13-Jan-2026 12:30 (12:30 PM)
EU / Western Tue 13-Jan-2026 17:30 (05:30 PM)
EU / Central Tue 13-Jan-2026 18:30 (06:30 PM)
EU / Eastern Tue 13-Jan-2026 19:30 (07:30 PM)
Moscow Tue 13-Jan-2026 20:30 (08:30 PM)
Chennai Tue 13-Jan-2026 23:00 (11:00 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 14-Jan-2026 01:30 (01:30 AM)
Tokyo Wed 14-Jan-2026 02:30 (02:30 AM)
Sydney Wed 14-Jan-2026 04:30 (04:30 AM)

or in your local time:

Links

Joining the meeting

Agenda

  • Have specific things to discuss? Please comment in the issue thread below to add specific items to the agenda.

Activity

  1. added
    Office HoursIssue announcing office hours and soliciting associated agenda items.
    on Jan 5, 2026
  2. navyansh007 commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @navyansh007

    1. Review Request: Half-Normal CDF Implementation

    I would like to request a review of my PR for the half-normal CDF implementation:

    PR: stdlib-js/stdlib#9429

    2. Question: ULP Tolerance for SiCi C Implementation

    I have a question regarding the acceptable ULP tolerance in the C implementation of SiCi functions:

    PR: stdlib-js/stdlib#8187

    Specifically, I'm using @stdlib/assert/is-almost-same-value with 10 ULPs for most test values, but in the zero-crossing region around x≈3.38 (where Ci(x) approaches zero), the implementation shows errors up to ~4100 ULPs.

    Question: Are 4100 ULPs acceptable for test tolerances in this zero-crossing region?

    The implementation now uses accurate auxiliary function methods for all large values rather than simplified approximations. I wanted to confirm if this level of tolerance is acceptable or if something else should be done.

  3. prajjwalbajpai commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @prajjwalbajpai
    Member
    1. I have made a PR implementing dlartgp routine in LAPACK, would appreciate a review.
    2. Whilst working on other LAPACK routines, I had to manually search whether a PR already existed for the given routine. Would it be a good idea for me to create a list of all LAPACK routines, in working order, and track their implementation status?
    3. I am aiming to continue the LAPACK project for GSoC'26. Apart from LAPACK, what other areas or issues in stdlib should I explore to gain a broader understanding of the project?
  4. manit2004 commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @manit2004
    • Review on PR #9730 implementing core of wald variance package.
    • Comment on the sheet made earlier with dists common both in julia and scipy
  5. aryan7071 commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @aryan7071

    I’ve raised the following pull requests in the past week

    • math/base/special

    1. round10f #9525
    2. round2f #9695
    • stats/base/ndarray

    1. cumaxabs #9624
    2. cuminabs #9627
    3. sdsnanmean #9635
    4. snanstdev #9656
    • constants/float16

    1. fourth-root-eps #9610
    • Documentation (Good First Issue)

    1. Improve doctests for complex number instances in ndarray/base/unary #8999

    Status

    I’ve addressed all the issues that were reviewed and pointed out to me.
    I wanted to check if any of these still need further changes.
    I’d appreciate guidance on which issues I should work on next.

    Image

    Question

    While running make lint, I’m also seeing filename-related lint errors in several scaffold packages under @stdlib/_tools/scaffold. These files currently exist with a .txt extension (e.g., README_md.txt, Makefile.txt).

    I wanted to confirm whether these .txt filenames are intentional and part of the stdlib scaffold conventions, or if this is an issue that needs to be addressed by renaming them to their expected forms (e.g., README.md, Makefile).

    If this is a real issue, I’d be happy to raise an issue for it and work on fixing it.

  6. DhruvArvindSingh commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @DhruvArvindSingh

    Comment on this LINK

  7. anoofmhd commented on Jan 13, 2026

    @anoofmhd

    can you please review the PR #8502 which resolves the issue #5592

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Office HoursIssue announcing office hours and soliciting associated agenda items.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions