[flying-sheep]

@Zethson @grst @ilia-kats maybe this is a good idea for all our CHANGELOG.md projects?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c63b0ac) to head (cdf2a37).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #68   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           11        11           
  Lines          618       629   +11     
=========================================
+ Hits           618       629   +11     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/scverse_doc/autodoc/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/config.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/registry.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/source.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/theme/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/typed_fields.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/scverse_doc/xref_overrides.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[grst]

This enforces conventional commits, right? If we do that, we could also just autogenerate the changelog directly?
I'm conflicted on whether we should any additional constraints to not increase the burden for beginners.

Either way, let's continue the discussion in scverse/cookiecutter-scverse#345