Skip to content

ARSN-626: bump sproxydclient to 8.2.2 - #2687

Merged
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/8.4from
bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

ARSN-626: bump sproxydclient to 8.2.2#2687
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/8.4from
bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient

Conversation

@tcarmet

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sproxyd now answers DELETE and batch-delete requests with 204 No Content. The sproxyd client Arsenal depends on only accepted 200 and 206 as success, so those replies were treated as failures, retried, and eventually surfaced to callers as internal errors. This picks up the client version that accepts any 2xx, so deletes succeed again.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request.
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue ARSN-626 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 8.4.24

  • 8.5.15

Please check the Fix Version/s of ARSN-626, or the target
branch of this pull request.

Comment thread package.json Outdated
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.42%. Comparing base (c3f1564) to head (8c136af).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/8.4    #2687   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            74.42%   74.42%           
================================================
  Files                  229      229           
  Lines                18546    18546           
  Branches              3809     3834   +25     
================================================
  Hits                 13802    13802           
  Misses                4739     4739           
  Partials                 5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

sproxydclient now treats any 2xx response from sproxyd as a success
instead of whitelisting 200 and 206. sproxyd answers DELETE and
POST .batch_delete with 204 (no content), which the previous
whitelist turned into an error, and DataWrapper then retried three
times before surfacing an InternalError.

Also bumps the package version to 8.4.24.

Issue: ARSN-626
@tcarmet
tcarmet force-pushed the bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient branch from a8390e2 to 8c136af Compare August 18, 2026 19:03
@tcarmet
tcarmet requested a review from a team August 18, 2026 19:23
@tcarmet
tcarmet marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 19:23
@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Aug 18, 2026
@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflict

A conflict has been raised during the creation of
integration branch w/8.5/bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient with contents from bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient
and development/8.5.

I have not created the integration branch.

Here are the steps to resolve this conflict:

 git fetch
 git checkout -B w/8.5/bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient origin/development/8.5
 git merge origin/bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient
 # <intense conflict resolution>
 git commit
 git push -u origin w/8.5/bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/status

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Status

check status
➡️ Approvals ❗ author approval required — 2 peer approval(s) missing
➡️ Integration builds ☀️
➡️ Fix versions ☀️
➡️ History ☀️

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tcarmet

tcarmet commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/8.4

  • ✔️ development/8.5

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1
  • development/8.2
  • development/8.3

This pull request does not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
will be left untouched:

  • hotfix/8.2.48
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.5.0
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/7.10.46
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.4.6
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.70.20
  • hotfix/7.10.57
  • hotfix/7.70.14
  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.10.43
  • hotfix/7.10.31
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/7.70.25
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.4.7
  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.10.4
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.10.29
  • hotfix/7.70.4
  • hotfix/7.10.36
  • hotfix/7.10.47
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/6.4.7

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/8.4

  • ✔️ development/8.5

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1
  • development/8.2
  • development/8.3

Please check the status of the associated issue ARSN-626.

Goodbye tcarmet.

@bert-e
bert-e merged commit 8c136af into development/8.4 Aug 19, 2026
20 checks passed
@bert-e
bert-e deleted the bugfix/ARSN-626-bump-sproxydclient branch August 19, 2026 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants