Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Pre-compute padded numbers in formatTime - #422

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-time-formatting-14628336747708767758
Open

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Pre-compute padded numbers in formatTime#422
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-time-formatting-14628336747708767758

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Pre-compute an array of zero-padded strings for numbers 0-59 to use in time formatting.
🎯 Why: Avoids repeated string allocation and padStart calls on high-throughput render paths for time display in the CLI UI.
📊 Impact: Reduces time formatting execution from ~325ns to ~93ns (~70% improvement).
🔬 Measurement: Benchmarked using mitata to compare string allocation versus array lookup for numbers 0-59.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14628336747708767758 started by @YoungSx

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants