Skip to content

Rollup of 8 pull requests - #162659

Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 25 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-ryAjFPL
Closed

Rollup of 8 pull requests#162659
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 25 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-ryAjFPL

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

cuviper and others added 25 commits August 20, 2026 15:24
* Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView`

Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`.
* Apply suggestion from @tisonkun
* Update library/core/src/sync/sync_view.rs

Co-authored-by: Laine Taffin Altman <alexanderaltman@me.com>
We have Rust Compiler Development Guide for that.
I've not paid much attention to it in recent times
…r=saethlin

mir-transform: Remove `is_optimization_stage`

Based on rust-lang#160524 until that one is merged

rust-lang#160524 (comment)
Re-export `core::fmt::NumBuffer` in `alloc` (and `std`)

We just stabilized `core::fmt::NumBuffer` in Rust 1.98, but it seems to be a simple oversight that this was not also re-exported in `alloc::fmt` (and `std` just re-exports that whole module). Let's correct that.

I'm marking this stable right away, although I don't think the later `since` version will be properly rendered in docs for a re-export. I'm not sure it's worth trying to clarify that in freeform documentation.
…ail, r=jieyouxu

Prevent `should-fail` to be used in `rustdoc-ui` testsuite

Follow-up of rust-lang#162030 and discussion with @fmease.

There is no reason to use `should-fail` for `rustdoc-ui` (or `rustdoc-html`) testsuite, so let's prevent it.

r? @fmease
Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView`

Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`.

This refers to rust-lang#98407
…yuwu

Remove unused arguments of functions

That these arguments are unused was hidden by the `#[trace::instrument]` macro, which uses the arguments.
I don't see an easy way to avoid this from happening in the future.
… r=jieyouxu

Remove needless test running instructions

We have Rust Compiler Development Guide for that.

r? @jieyouxu
…atrieb

Remove noras target docs mention

I've not paid much attention to it in recent times
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Sep 11, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-compiletest Area: The compiletest test runner A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs labels Sep 11, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Sep 11, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r+ p=5

Trying commonly failed jobs
@bors try jobs=dist-various-1,test-various,test-x86_64-gnu-aux,test-x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3,test-x86_64-msvc-1,test-aarch64-apple-1,test-aarch64-apple-2,test-x86_64-mingw-1,test-i686-msvc,test-armhf-gnu

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit c467623 has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 11, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2026
Rollup of 8 pull requests


try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: test-x86_64-gnu-aux
try-job: test-x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3
try-job: test-x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: test-aarch64-apple-1
try-job: test-aarch64-apple-2
try-job: test-x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: test-i686-msvc
try-job: test-armhf-gnu
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 11, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts by rebasing.

This pull request was unapproved.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Sep 11, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 1b7127f (1b7127f4d22d7dbc9545f386b937013d25ba18cc)
Base parent: ada41e1 (ada41e1ce81819f01577c0ee40ccbd6fc41384e8)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-compiletest Area: The compiletest test runner A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants