Skip to content

feat: information and measurement#22

Draft
oameye wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
information
Draft

feat: information and measurement#22
oameye wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
information

Conversation

@oameye

@oameye oameye commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Results

Details
Benchmark suite Current: fe500d8 Previous: 009b439 Ratio
Correlations/two-time/single photon cavity 311343150 ns 282088691 ns 1.10
Interaction Picture/coefficient matrix M/analytical (2 equal modes) 12934 ns 13871 ns 0.93
Interaction Picture/coefficient matrix M/numerical (ODE) 72696 ns 73451 ns 0.99
Interaction Picture/coupling matrix evaluation/2 modes 98.74315789473684 ns 109.43257820927724 ns 0.90
Interaction Picture/coupling matrix evaluation/4 modes 214.1117117117117 ns 220.56716417910448 ns 0.97
Interaction Picture/operator substitution/TLS cascade 86762 ns 78759 ns 1.10
Pulse Couplings/multi-pulse/input 2 modes 412141 ns 425233 ns 0.97
Pulse Couplings/multi-pulse/output 2 modes 459450 ns 490913 ns 0.94
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/input 374150 ns 353034 ns 1.06
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/input Gaussian 94.00104821802935 ns 91.06792058516197 ns 1.03
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/output 409977 ns 389409 ns 1.05
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/output Gaussian 88.32083333333334 ns 90.9633891213389 ns 0.97
SLH Algebra/closure evaluation/2-QD waveguide H(t) 35406 ns 37086 ns 0.95
SLH Algebra/closure evaluation/2-QD waveguide L(t) 3262.25 ns 3542.875 ns 0.92
SLH Algebra/numeric/2-QD waveguide composition 21861 ns 21893 ns 1.00
SLH Algebra/symbolic/3-cavity cascade 8048.333333333333 ns 8153 ns 0.99
SLH Algebra/symbolic/concatenate + cascade 2804.1111111111113 ns 3043.25 ns 0.92
SLH Algebra/symbolic/feedback OPO loop 6919 ns 7023.25 ns 0.99
Translation/closure evaluation/3-cavity H(t) 20168 ns 19449 ns 1.04
Translation/closure evaluation/3-cavity L(t) 14788 ns 14712 ns 1.01
Translation/static/atom-cavity 72686 ns 32920 ns 2.21
Translation/time-dependent/3-cavity H+L 587378 ns 502680 ns 1.17
Translation/time-dependent/atom-cavity 116738 ns 86711 ns 1.35

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Benchmark Results'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.30.

Benchmark suite Current: fe500d8 Previous: 009b439 Ratio
Translation/static/atom-cavity 72686 ns 32920 ns 2.21
Translation/time-dependent/atom-cavity 116738 ns 86711 ns 1.35

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.37398% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (009b439) to head (fe500d8).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/information.jl 97.50% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #22      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.15%   93.63%   +0.48%     
==========================================
  Files           6        7       +1     
  Lines         555      660     +105     
==========================================
+ Hits          517      618     +101     
- Misses         38       42       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@oameye oameye marked this pull request as draft June 26, 2026 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant