Skip to content
Navigation Menu
Sign in
Appearance settings
Platform
AI CODE CREATION
GitHub Copilot
Write better code with AI
GitHub Copilot app
Direct agents from issue to merge
MCP Registry
Integrate external tools
DEVELOPER WORKFLOWS
Actions
Automate any workflow
Codespaces
Instant dev environments
Issues
Plan and track work
Code Review
Manage code changes
Code Quality
Enforce quality at merge
APPLICATION SECURITY
GitHub Advanced Security
Find and fix vulnerabilities
Code security
Secure your code as you build
Secret protection
Stop leaks before they start
EXPLORE
Why GitHub
Documentation
Blog
Changelog
Marketplace
View all features
Solutions
BY COMPANY SIZE
Enterprises
Small and medium teams
Startups
Nonprofits
BY USE CASE
App Modernization
DevSecOps
DevOps
CI/CD
View all use cases
BY INDUSTRY
Healthcare
Financial services
Manufacturing
Government
View all industries
View all solutions
Resources
EXPLORE BY TOPIC
AI
Software Development
DevOps
Security
View all topics
EXPLORE BY TYPE
Customer stories
Events & webinars
Ebooks & reports
Business insights
GitHub Skills
SUPPORT & SERVICES
Documentation
Customer support
Community forum
Trust center
Partners
View all resources
Open Source
COMMUNITY
GitHub Sponsors
Fund open source developers
PROGRAMS
Security Lab
Maintainer Community
GitHub Stars
Archive Program
REPOSITORIES
Topics
Trending
Collections
Enterprise
ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS
Enterprise platform
AI-powered developer platform
AVAILABLE ADD-ONS
GitHub Advanced Security
Enterprise-grade security features
Copilot for Business
Enterprise-grade AI features
Premium Support
Enterprise-grade 24/7 support
Pricing
Search
/
Sign in
Sign up
Appearance settings
You signed in with another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
You signed out in another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
You switched accounts on another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.
Please reload this page
.
pydantic
/
datafusion
Public
forked from
apache/datafusion
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork
4
Star
9
Code
Pull requests
1
Actions
Projects
Security and quality
0
Insights
Additional navigation options
Code
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security and quality
Insights
Actions: pydantic/datafusion
Actions
All workflows
Workflows
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment
Close stale PRs
Close stale PRs
CodeQL
CodeQL
CodSpeed
CodSpeed
Copilot
Copilot
Copilot code review
Copilot code review
Datafusion extended tests
Datafusion extended tests
Dependencies
Dependencies
Deploy DataFusion site
Deploy DataFusion site
Detect breaking changes
Detect breaking changes
Show more workflows...
Management
Caches
All workflows
All workflows
Actions
Loading...
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.
Please reload this page
.
will be ignored since log searching is not yet available
Showing runs from all workflows
will be ignored since log searching is not yet available
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs
Workflow
Filter by Workflow
Sorry, something went wrong.
Filter
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
No matching workflows.
Event
Filter by Event
Sorry, something went wrong.
Filter
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
No matching events.
Status
Filter by Status
Sorry, something went wrong.
Filter
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
No matching statuses.
Branch
Filter by Branch
Sorry, something went wrong.
Filter
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
No matching branches.
Actor
Filter by Actor
Sorry, something went wrong.
Filter
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong.
No matching users.
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment
#67:
Issue comment
#72 (comment)
created by
adriangb
1s
1s
View workflow file
fix: charge retained scratch indices capacity in GroupsAccumulatorAdapter
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment
#66:
Issue comment
#71 (comment)
created by
adriangb
2s
2s
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment
#65:
Issue comment
#70 (comment)
created by
adriangb
1s
1s
View workflow file
Detect breaking changes - Comment
Detect breaking changes - Comment
#19:
completed by
adriangb
11s
11s
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Labeler
#171:
Pull request
#70
edited by
adriangb
50s
50s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
CodeQL
#97:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
3m 39s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
3m 39s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Detect breaking changes
#19:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
24m 17s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
24m 17s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Dev
#3399:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
1m 51s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
1m 51s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Security audit
#202:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
26s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
26s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Datafusion extended tests
#353:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
In progress
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
In progress
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Docs
#662:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
2m 4s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
2m 4s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Dependencies
#1184:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
3m 50s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
3m 50s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Rust
#3300:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
23m 38s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
23m 38s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Large files PR check
#160:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
1m 8s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
1m 8s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: stop pre-allocating and undercounting a hash table per COUNT(DISTINCT) group
Labeler
#170:
Pull request
#70
synchronize by
adriangb
30s
30s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: grow the value buffer on a power of two ladder
Dependencies
#1183:
Commit
f31fc51
pushed by
adriangb
3m 49s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
3m 49s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: grow the value buffer on a power of two ladder
Dev
#3398:
Commit
f31fc51
pushed by
adriangb
2m 45s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
2m 45s
View #70
View workflow file
fix: grow the value buffer on a power of two ladder
Rust
#3299:
Commit
f31fc51
pushed by
adriangb
22m 23s
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
claude/bytes-map-initial-capacity-accounting
22m 23s
View #70
View workflow file
Detect breaking changes - Comment
Detect breaking changes - Comment
#18:
completed by
adriangb
9s
9s
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Labeler
#169:
Pull request
#72
edited by
adriangb
19s
19s
View #72
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Detect breaking changes
#18:
Pull request
#72
synchronize by
adriangb
18m 7s
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
18m 7s
View #72
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Dev
#3397:
Pull request
#72
synchronize by
adriangb
1m 8s
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
1m 8s
View #72
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Rust
#3298:
Pull request
#72
synchronize by
adriangb
24m 11s
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
24m 11s
View #72
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Dependencies
#1182:
Pull request
#72
synchronize by
adriangb
5m 35s
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
5m 35s
View #72
View workflow file
Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy
Large files PR check
#159:
Pull request
#72
synchronize by
adriangb
1m 37s
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
claude/single-distinct-to-groupby-allow-count
1m 37s
View #72
View workflow file
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
…
99
100
101
Next
You can’t perform that action at this time.