Fix LICENSE so GitHub/Glama detect it as MIT#56
Merged
Conversation
GitHub classified the license as "Other" because a non-standard "Author:" line was inserted into the MIT template body, breaking the matcher. Fold the attribution into the copyright line (still recognized as MIT) across the root and the two publishable package LICENSE files. Unblocks Glama's "cannot be installed" (license F) check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Live score badge alongside the existing shields; auto-updates as the Glama grade improves once the LICENSE fix lands and the listing re-scans. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Folds the author attribution into the copyright line across all three
LICENSEfiles (root + the two publishable packages), removing the standaloneAuthor:line:Why
GitHub's license detector (
licensee) currently classifies this repo as "Other," not MIT — confirmed via the API:The cause is the non-standard
Author: Hareendra Donapatiline inserted into the MIT template body, which breaks template matching.licenseetolerates arbitrary text on the copyright line but not an extra line in the body, so folding the name into the copyright line keeps the attribution while restoring a clean MIT match.Impact
Once merged, GitHub re-detects the repo as MIT, and Glama then auto-detects it (within a few hours, or via a manual re-scan). This clears the license = F finding and the "MCP servers without a LICENSE cannot be installed" block on the Glama listing.
Files:
LICENSE,packages/roku-dev-studio-api/LICENSE,packages/roku-dev-studio-remote-server/LICENSE.🤖 Generated with Claude Code