Skip to content

bug: prelim checks for complete repeat block dups#836

Open
Peter-J-Freeman wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
issue_810
Open

bug: prelim checks for complete repeat block dups#836
Peter-J-Freeman wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
issue_810

Conversation

@Peter-J-Freeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Expanded repeat blocks where the gap is exactly 1
repeat block with respect to the transcript cause
vv_hgvs and VV to miss duplicaations at the g>t
conversion. Refer to #810. The patterns can be
identified as shown in the code. However,
the conditional if statements may need to be
expanded with additional variants over time.
We also need to identify similar variants in
antisense genes wrt to the chr reference. However
this sets the framework and fixes the test variant in the linked issue

Expanded repeat blocks where the gap is exactly 1
repeat block with respect to the transcript cause
vv_hgvs and VV to miss duplicaations at the g>t
conversion. Refer to #810. The patterns can be
identified as shown in the code. However,
the conditional if statements may need to be
expanded with additional variants over time.
We also need to identify similar variants in
antisense genes wrt to the chr reference. However
this sets the framework and fixes the test variant
in the linked issue
import logging
import vvhgvs.exceptions
from . import utils as fn
from sqlparse.utils import offset

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't want this imported

@John-F-Wagstaff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

My brain is a bit fried today to go into the details on this one. I need to work through it step-wise to check the logic on the more complex conditional(pair), which could take a while.

@Peter-J-Freeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Yeah, these are a pain.

FYI, the reason these are not merged in the hard push code, the variants overlap, so cannot be merged by the current tool, so it goes through the path you see where it is spotted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants