Skip to content

Wrapping up the leftover tasks in xblocks-extra, prepare for the release#27

Draft
farhan wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
farhan/winding-down
Draft

Wrapping up the leftover tasks in xblocks-extra, prepare for the release#27
farhan wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
farhan/winding-down

Conversation

@farhan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@farhan farhan commented Apr 16, 2026

Ticket: #16

Reference PR's: while shifting to uv and writing upgrade-python-requirements.yml

openedx/openedx-aspects#340
openedx/xqueue-watcher#122

Tasks done in this PR:

  • License should be created/moved at the root
  • License has been added copied from xblocks-contrib repo
  • License should be bundled in the packaging
  • Implement python upgrade workflow
  • Move to uv (from pip)
  • How the common constraints for edx repos will be applied -c https://raw.githubusercontent.com/edx/edx-lint/master/edx_lint/files/common_constraints.txt
  • No need to implement it
  • catalog-info.yaml should be created at the root
  • Are we going to move openedx.yaml For example
  • PACKAGE DATA should be revised for all the xblocks as we are not shifting the packaging strategies for example
  • i18n should be supported, translations commands in make file is pending to add
  • Testing of docs is pending
  • Make sure all the readme content of the xblocks has been moved to the xblocks-extra repository. We should create different read-me files for different blocks in their directories for isolation and easy maintenance.
  • We should reference the inter block readmes to the main readme file and list the xblocks repo will contain.
  • We should also make sure all the migrated XBlocks have been marked deprecated and archived before closing this epic.
  • What about the issues created in the main repositories, should we move them all, I think so.
  • What about the un-merged PR's, I think as soon as we make xblocks-extra ready, publish it on pypi, we can drop message on the PR's to shift their PR's.
  • Adding @kdmccormick comment on xblocks-extra:
We should make sure:

Existing sites will be able to uninstall the old packages and install xblocks-extra seamlessly.
There will be documentation explaining that to them.
Both the old repos and xblocks-extra work in Verawood, so that they have a full release to transition.
  • Write transition/migration notes for the Verawood open edx release

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.98%. Comparing base (2f72077) to head (e24427d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #27   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.98%   86.98%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         269      269           
  Branches       23       23           
=======================================
  Hits          234      234           
  Misses         31       31           
  Partials        4        4           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@farhan farhan marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2026 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant