Skip to content

docs: carry generated-file ownership guidance to next - #4196

Merged
jbeckwith-oai merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
codex/python-next-generated-guidance
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

jbeckwith-oai merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
codex/python-next-generated-guidance

Conversation

@jbeckwith-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Carry the reviewed generated-file ownership guidance from merged #4193 into next, so contributors follow the simplified generation model before its next regeneration.

All four documents exactly match main commit 1b37b9a85e857a7ada4db661bf867bf680290ccf. They replace the retired budget instructions with the rule to change generator inputs/compiler, regenerate owned files, and keep handwritten behavior in separate extensions. Ordinary review enforces ownership; no replacement checker is introduced.

This is the handwritten-documentation prerequisite only. Generated tools, inventory, generation metadata, runtime, dependencies, workflows, and release behavior are unchanged; canonical next regeneration will remove the retired generated tools separately.

Validation: basic review, exact byte comparison of all four documents against the merged main commit, four-file scope assertion, and git diff --check pass. No runtime tests were rerun for this documentation-only change. SDK CODEOWNER review and normal next CI are required.

@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 18:38
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T18:40:51.973986Z ec7430a PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T18:40:25.715919Z ec7430a PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai enabled auto-merge (squash) October 27, 2026 18:39

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ec7430abf8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread AGENTS.md Resolved
@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai merged commit c2c9bd5 into next Oct 27, 2026
28 checks passed
@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai deleted the codex/python-next-generated-guidance branch October 27, 2026 18:44
jbeckwith-oai added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2026
## Summary
Correct documentation feedback from
#4196, which merged while
these fixes were being prepared. Refresh AGENTS.md evidence citations to
the credential, redaction, and large-payload rules, and remove the
obsolete instruction to submit budget changes as ratchet-only PRs.

## Validation
Basic review confirmed only the citation numbers and obsolete sentence
changed. Compared every cited AGENTS.md location with the actual rule
and ran git diff --check. No runtime or generated-file changes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants