Skip to content

docs: clarify next tooling retirement across revisions - #1293

Merged
jbeckwith-oai merged 2 commits into
nextfrom
codex/java-next-contributor-transition
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

jbeckwith-oai merged 2 commits into
nextfrom
codex/java-next-contributor-transition

Conversation

@jbeckwith-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The next contributor guidance currently says this revision retains the legacy Castiron checker and reporting workflows. Canonical regeneration removes those files, leaving that wording stale.

Describe the transition in terms of the actual checkout: preserve checks while the legacy tooling exists, retire it through regeneration, and inspect hosted workflow settings and repository rules separately. This changes only AGENTS.md and CONTRIBUTING.md; generated-file ownership and required-check protections remain intact.

This public-owned documentation prerequisite addresses the guidance concern in #1291. That generated promotion will refresh onto this baseline after merge.

Validation: reviewed both complete diffs, checked unchanged policy links and headings, and ran git diff --check. No runtime or workflow changes.

@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 22:27
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T22:35:11.184284Z 52b2d1e New commits
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T22:35:28.195568Z 52b2d1e New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

dpiet-oai
dpiet-oai previously approved these changes Oct 27, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ef46bb8ceb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread AGENTS.md Resolved
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md Resolved
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md Resolved

@markstuart-oai markstuart-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed all three changed files at 52b2d1e9c008. The guidance preserves generated-file ownership, the unconditional ban on new budget changes, and required checks while distinguishing retired files from hosted settings. The six security-model citations now match the current policy and component sections. The three earlier findings are addressed; no actionable findings remain.

Source-only review; no local tests or builds ran. Hosted CI is still finishing.

@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai enabled auto-merge (squash) October 27, 2026 22:44
@jbeckwith-oai
jbeckwith-oai merged commit 2342ceb into next Oct 27, 2026
28 of 29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants