[stable33] fix(encryption): use the closest cached parent for the access list - #64962
Merged
Merged
Conversation
backportbot
Bot
requested review from
CarlSchwan,
come-nc,
icewind1991 and
leftybournes
and removed request for
a team
September 30, 2026 20:03
backportbot
Bot
added
bug
3. to review
susnux
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2026
icewind1991
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2026
Copying a folder creates the target directories on the storage before their cache entries exist, so while the files inside are written the parent of the target path can not be resolved yet. With per-user keys the encryption stream needs the access list on every write, so the unguarded $userFolder->get($parent) made every folder copy fail with a NotFoundException. Walk up to the closest ancestor that is known to the cache instead. Shares only exist on cached nodes, so its access list is the one that applies and the share keys of the recipients are still created when copying into a shared folder. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <opensource@fthiessen.de>
susnux
force-pushed
the
backport/64289/stable33
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 1, 2026 12:02
41ca989 to
c82798f
Compare
decrypt-all wrote core/encryption_enabled through the typed app config while every other accessor on this branch - Manager::isEnabled(), encryption:enable, encryption:disable and the provisioning API - reads and writes it as the string "yes"/"no". The first decrypt-all therefore switched the stored type to boolean, after which encryption:enable threw an AppConfigTypeConflictException and isEnabled() no longer recognised the value. The legacy accessors are deprecated, so the command joins encryption:enable and encryption:disable in the psalm baseline. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <opensource@fthiessen.de>
susnux
force-pushed
the
backport/64289/stable33
branch
from
October 1, 2026 12:20
c82798f to
21d49e2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of PR #64289