Skip to content

Archive completed OpenSpec changes - #2164

Open
Aaronontheweb wants to merge 3 commits into
netclaw-dev:devfrom
Aaronontheweb:chore/archive-completed-openspecs
Open

Aaronontheweb wants to merge 3 commits into
netclaw-dev:devfrom
Aaronontheweb:chore/archive-completed-openspecs

Conversation

@Aaronontheweb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

Eleven completed OpenSpec changes remained in the active change list.
This PR archives those changes and updates the canonical specifications.

Changes

This PR archives:

  • memory-relevance-gate
  • make-agent-tools-pit-of-success
  • repair-agent-tool-boundaries
  • complete-tool-remediation
  • prevent-native-tool-shell-mistakes
  • mcp-tool-outcome-receipts
  • deterministic-native-smoke-tui-recovery
  • correlate-tool-authorization-attempts
  • complete-shell-correction-cutover
  • share-checked-shell-start
  • secure-host-pairing-proof

The archive date is 2026-09-12.

The archive process synced seven delta sets into the main specifications.
Four changes already had their canonical requirements in the main specifications.
The process preserved those requirements and skipped duplicate sync operations.

The PR also records the maintainer decision that code with live LLM exposure does not require a later eval run or binary swap check.
It closes only those evidence tasks.
Unrelated implementation, migration, audit, and dependency tasks remain open.

Validation

  • openspec validate --specs --strict: 74 passed; 1 existing failure in thread-history-backfill due duplicate requirement names.
  • openspec validate --changes --strict: 4 active changes passed; 2 existing active changes still fail validation.
  • openspec validate memory-core-redesign --type change --strict: passed after inherited scenarios were preserved.
  • openspec doctor: passed.
  • git diff --check: passed.

No product code changed. No product test run was required.

@Aaronontheweb
Aaronontheweb enabled auto-merge (squash) September 12, 2026 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant