fix(docs): use production worker name - #161
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 92a0643 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe production docs Worker name changes. The link-check workflow adjusts its exclusions and adds a production homepage check. The README and usage-limits documentation use updated MiniMax Token Plan links. ChangesProduction Worker name
Documentation links and checks
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to Preview and production deployments resolve their intended Worker names. No actionable merge-blocking risk is established by the reviewed changes. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change is limited to the documentation site's production resource name. Preview naming remains compatible, and the public domain is unchanged. No introduced security issue was established, but cleanup of the previous resource and recovery from an interrupted deployment remain unverified. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Hardening Proposals
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checked each link at dawn Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment successful View Cloudflare logs |
opencode-plugins-docs-pr-161 | 92a06430 | 2026-10-02T08:45:26.170Z |
Diagnostics: View GitHub Actions run
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 4 files (changes from recent commits).
Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 3 files (changes from recent commits).
Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.
Re-trigger cubic
Summary
opencode-plugins-docs-prodand keep preview names stage-specific.The production deploy has succeeded with the new name, and the site responds with HTTP 200. The
apps/webdeploy script is unchanged.Checks
bun run checkbun run --filter @mynameistito/opencode-plugins-docs typecheckbun run --filter @mynameistito/opencode-plugins-docs testbunx changeset status