Repository navigation
.NET: document reasoning summaries for AG-UI - #8550
Open
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic) wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic) wants to merge 1 commit into
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
temporarily deployed
to
github-app-auth
September 19, 2026 21:42 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
temporarily deployed
to
github-app-auth
September 19, 2026 21:42 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
had a problem deploying
to
github-app-auth
September 19, 2026 21:43 — with
GitHub Actions
Error
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
temporarily deployed
to
github-app-auth
September 19, 2026 21:43 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 19, 2026 21:43
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
temporarily deployed
to
github-app-auth
September 19, 2026 21:43 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟢 Approval recommended
The documentation accurately reflects the current agent, Harness, and AG-UI streaming APIs.
Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None
What changed in this PR
Documents how AG-UI reasoning summaries are configured and diagnosed.
Changes:
- Adds standard and Harness agent configuration guidance.
- Explains provider/API compatibility and troubleshooting steps.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
dotnet/samples/02-agents/AGUI/README.md |
Adds reasoning-summary setup and diagnostics. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
force-pushed
the
contrib/8426-agui-reasoning
branch
from
October 22, 2026 12:29
bdff2a0 to
a27cc8e
Compare
Naveen Chatlapalli (1aifanatic)
deployed
to
github-app-auth
October 22, 2026 12:29 — with
GitHub Actions
Active
4 of 7 tasks
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation & Context
An AG-UI endpoint can stream normal replies without any visible reasoning when the agent has not requested a provider-supported summary. The sample README does not explain where to configure this or how to distinguish a provider configuration issue from a frontend rendering issue.
Description & Review Guide
ChatClientAgentOptions.ChatOptions.Reasoning, the equivalent Harness configuration, provider/API compatibility guidance, and a three-stage diagnostic path fromTextReasoningContentto SSE to the frontend.REASONING_MESSAGE_CONTENTwith the expected summary, followed by normal text and a successful run finish. Harness reasoning options also compile. No live model call or frontend test was performed; no new framework behavior is claimed.Related Issue
Fixes #8426. The reporter confirmed that existing reasoning options work and requested documentation. No competing PR was found in issue cross-references or PR searches.
Contribution Checklist