discipline: sharpen skill #7566
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
needs-specNeeds a Brief or plan before anyone can build it.Needs a Brief or plan before anyone can build it.priority: lowNice-to-have, cosmetic, or speculative; opportunistic.Nice-to-have, cosmetic, or speculative; opportunistic.work-class: scopedA briefed fix or small feature; blast radius bounded by the brief, tests exist.A briefed fix or small feature; blast radius bounded by the brief, tests exist.
Description
Parent
Refs #7555. Source: PLAN Phase 0, topic poteto-review. Thread: sharpen skill (deferred).
Depends on
- none (parked: opens on the reopen trigger below, not on an edge)
Reopen trigger
The owner's sessions show the repeated ask.
Outcome
When reopened: Lauren's sharpen ships as a one-paragraph, user-typed discipline skill; the
loosen-a-constraint line lives only inside it.
Decisions
- Deferred (Q172, Q173, D105). Origin: Lauren's (the skill), placement ours.
- Options on record: a
/playbooks:fable-5chapter (Q132, rejected: not model-neutral); a
/discovery:blindspotaction (Q127, replaced).
Key interfaces
None (deferred, no module change yet).
Done when
- Session evidence of the repeated ask is cited in a comment.
- A slice is filed under this item.
Out of scope
- Any other discipline skill change.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
needs-specNeeds a Brief or plan before anyone can build it.Needs a Brief or plan before anyone can build it.priority: lowNice-to-have, cosmetic, or speculative; opportunistic.Nice-to-have, cosmetic, or speculative; opportunistic.work-class: scopedA briefed fix or small feature; blast radius bounded by the brief, tests exist.A briefed fix or small feature; blast radius bounded by the brief, tests exist.
Type
Fields
Work status
needs-spec
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 16, 2026
Proposed work class: work-class: scoped
Basis: automated intake triage; the lanes App applied this class.
Size: Small
Complexity: Low
Uncertainty: Known
Flags: none
Blocked by: none
Decision recorded by kyle-sexton (#7566 (comment)):
That decision settles the open questions. The
sharpenskill stays parked until session evidence of the repeated ask is cited. The one piece of work that can go ahead now is a docs edit. It changes docs/upstream/cursor-pstack.md so it names #7566, not #7589, as the parking issue forsharpen. Likely related: #7589.Automated triage, applied by the lanes App.
kyle-sexton commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Released for re-triage under the owner's 2026-10-24 rule: an issue stops for a person only for an intent or vision question, a security call, a host or attended run, or spend outside prepaid credit. The hold label came off and intake triage runs again now; it re-applies a hold, with a numbered question, when one of those applies.
To hold this issue again, add
needs-human(orstatus: needs-decision) and say why in a comment.melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Refinement. A read-only run explored this repository, searched its issues and pull requests, and read the allowed docs to draft what follows. On an issue a listed human filed, it counts as the issue's spec once posted, while unedited; it is still model text, so check it.
Intended outcome: Lauren's sharpen ships as a one-paragraph, user-typed discipline skill once the owner's sessions show the repeated ask; until then it stays parked.
Related work
Open questions
RECOMMENDED: No: keep it parked; the owner cites session evidence in a comment if it has fired. Basis: The issue body has no session evidence and the only comment (kyle-sexton) just releases it for re-triage; only the owner can name the sessions.
RECOMMENDED: Keep #7566 for the sharpen skill and fix docs/upstream/cursor-pstack.md:339 to point at it, or close one as a duplicate of the other. Basis: .base/docs/upstream/cursor-pstack.md:339
RECOMMENDED: Yes, as the issue's Outcome and Out of scope say. Basis: issue body Outcome and Out of scope sections
Sources read
Automated refinement by the lanes App. Answer with a comment whose first line is
**Decision recorded.**.kyle-sexton commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Decision recorded. The owner answered in the Refinement session (2026-10-25), deciding the open items below on the facts:
Question asked: Keep #7566 parked as the one parking record for
sharpen, and repoint cursor-pstack.md from #7589 to it?Decided: No. Keep it parked; only the owner can cite the sessions. Basis: no comment cites session evidence; body "Done when"; kept.
sharpen: discipline: sharpen skill #7566 or discipline: paved-path file and principle placement #7589?Decided: discipline: sharpen skill #7566, which holds the outcome and decisions for the skill; change docs/upstream/cursor-pstack.md to point at it, or close one issue as a duplicate of the other. Basis: docs/upstream/cursor-pstack.md:115 and :337-342 on origin/main (4b62d6c) say
sharpenis deferred under discipline: paved-path file and principle placement #7589; corrected the line numbers (the refinement cited :113 and :339, which have drifted). The content of discipline: paved-path file and principle placement #7589 was not read here.Decided: Yes, as the body's Outcome and Out of scope say. Basis: body "Outcome" and "Out of scope"; kept.
Acceptance criteria:
- [ ]"Done when" lines stand as written.sharpen, the same one this issue's decision picks (item 2).Checks a person runs:
melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Oct 26, 2026
The lanes App's pull request #10216 merged with
Refs:, so this issue stays open and nothing starts the lane on it again. work-unblock removedstatus: readyandagent-ready, so the hourly triage sweep sends it back to intake triage, which decides what work is left and admits it again.