Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Jeffy Loop - point it at a project, give it a budget, come back to a better codebase and a report

Validate Claude Code Platform License: MIT

Quick Install  ·  Usage  ·  How it works  ·  The receipts  ·  Headless  ·  White paper

Autonomous Engineering With Proof

Agents that don’t just act.
They audit · verify · attack · and prove.

Jeffy Loop is an autonomous engineering system built around a simple principle: AI agents shouldn’t just produce work. They should produce evidence that the work is correct. Instead of asking an agent to complete a task and trusting its conclusion, Jeffy creates a continuous Audit → Attack → Verify → Prove loop in which specialized agents inspect the work, challenge it, validate the result, and generate an auditable record of what happened. The goal isn’t simply autonomous code generation; it is autonomous engineering with proof - where every claimed result is accompanied by reproducible evidence that can be independently examined.

Jeffy treats “done” as something that must be demonstrated, not declared. The system is designed to turn autonomous engineering from a conversational interaction into an evidence-producing process: actions leave traces, decisions have provenance, failures are exposed rather than hidden, and successful outcomes produce a durable receipt of what was changed, why it was changed, and how the result was verified.

The proof

Jeffy was run against 132 open-source projects with no connection to this repository, each judged by its own test suite, every run published, failures included.

Projects tested Converged Failed PRs merged PRs open Issues filed
132 103 28 30 34 4
Pie chart of the 103 converged public targets by language: Python 20 at 19.4 percent, Rust 14 at 13.6 percent, Go 12 at 11.7 percent, JavaScript 10 at 9.7 percent, C++ 7 at 6.8 percent, Java 6 at 5.8 percent, Ruby 6 at 5.8 percent, Swift 6 at 5.8 percent, C 5 at 4.9 percent, PHP 5 at 4.9 percent, TypeScript 5 at 4.9 percent, Kotlin 4 at 3.9 percent, C# 3 at 2.9 percent.

103 projects run to convergence across 13 languages with no language-specific analyzer or ruleset. Derived from the scorecard at render time.

Independent Validation

A merged pull request is the one result Jeffy cannot award itself. It takes an independent maintainer, someone with no stake in this project, to review the patch and accept it into their own codebase. Maintainers across 24 open source projects have done exactly that, including:

Merged by Pull request Merged in
Google snappy #257
Every release build compressed a 4 GiB input into a stream whose header claimed 0 bytes
1 day
Apple swift-log #504
A documented no-op setter asserted instead
2 days
swift-log #503
A handler implementing only log(event:) overflowed the stack on the SwiftLog 1.0 entry point
5 days
swift-protobuf #2164
The project's own CMake build of protoc-gen-swift had not compiled since June
15 hours
Microsoft mimalloc #1385
The zeroing allocator returned uninitialized memory above the small-size threshold
8 hours
snmalloc #878
The header-only build recipe named a CMake target removed in 2021 and include paths that resolved nowhere
2 hours
Apache commons-text #768
A StringMatcher overload forwarded the buffer end as its start
2 days
commons-csv #633
The record counter's Javadoc said headers were not counted while the constructor's header was
3 days
JetBrains kotlinx-datetime #650
Deprecation quick-fixes pointed developers at the wrong replacement
90 minutes
kotlinx-datetime #649
The Unicode pattern parser dropped the escaped quote inside a literal
4 days
Node.js ada #1244
The URL parser Node.js ships reported host_end one byte short
12 minutes
Cloudflare circl #700
The PKI marshal functions panicked on the library's own post-quantum keys instead of returning an error
1 day
circl #699
The hybrid KEM derived a different key pair from the same seed on a random subset of calls
1 day
uuid-rs uuid #907
The UUIDv7 counter lost its top four bits to the version nibble (178 million crates.io downloads in the last 90 days)
6 days

See every project, every patch, and every failure

Quick Install

You need Claude Code, signed in once, and git. The installer handles everything else, including jq.

git clone https://github.com/lenamonj/jeffy-loop.git
cd jeffy-loop
./install.sh        # Windows PowerShell: .\install.ps1

If PowerShell refuses with "running scripts is disabled on this system", run in PowerShell:

powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\install.ps1

Or from PyPI, no clone needed; pipx install jeffy-loop and uv tool install jeffy-loop work the same way:

pip install jeffy-loop
jeffy install       # installs Jeffy as a Claude Code skill

Running Jeffy

Open Claude Code in the project you want to improve and type /jeffy 10. It is a slash command inside the session, not a shell command.

/jeffy                                     # 10 iterations, full-spectrum improvement
/jeffy 5                                   # 5 iterations
/jeffy 12 accessibility and performance    # 12 iterations with a focus directive
/jeffy 5 --highs                           # High hunt: find and fix only the Highs
/jeffy 10 --max-time 2h                    # 10 iterations, but stop after two hours either way

When the run ends, start a new session to run it again; the restart is doing real work. A High hunt fixes only the Highs and stops at the first audit that finds none, so it is usually the faster run. Usage covers every flag, rounds and budgets, scoped mode, and cancelling.

What the engine enforces

Each one is enforced by the iteration prompt, the state files, or the Stop hook. How.

  1. It audits like an engineer, not a linter. A finding exists only when the loop can point at it and prove it with a runnable check.
  2. It cannot wreck your repo. Every iteration is a local commit, a broken verify is reverted, and nothing is ever pushed.
  3. "Done" is not the agent's opinion. An adversarial evaluator and a shell gate re-check every declaration.
  4. It cannot declare convergence over code it never looked at. The loop maps the public surface into a checklist, every swept row records the commit it certified, and the Stop hook refuses the declaration while any row is unswept.
  5. Lessons become machinery. A rule learned once binds every later iteration, and the engine itself passes 347 behavioural checks on Linux, Windows and macOS.

Documentation

Page What it covers
Usage Flags, rounds and budgets, High hunt, scoped mode, cancelling, upgrading, uninstalling, and what to know before a first run
How it works The run lifecycle, what the engine enforces, the full rule set, what a converged stop looks like, and how the loop improves itself
Headless runs Running budgeted rounds unattended from bash or PowerShell
The receipts Every open-source target with its outcome, the merged patches, the greenfield builds
Contributing The validator and the review bar
White paper For readers new to agent loops: how loops got here, every rule from first principles, and what this method still cannot do

Important

Trust model. The engine is one shell script, skills/jeffy/hooks/stop-hook.sh, plus the small library beside it in skills/jeffy/hooks/lib/, registered as a Claude Code Stop hook. In a session with no live Jeffy state file it exits at once and does nothing. The installer writes two skill folders under ~/.claude/skills, one hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json, and, only if you say yes when jq is missing, a jq install through your package manager.

License

MIT

About

Jeffy Loop is an autonomous software-engineering control system that forces an LLM to continuously audit, act, verify, checkpoint, and prove convergence.

Topics

Resources

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

8 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages