Skip to content

⚡ Batch chip, participant, and division insertions in receiver DB - #248

Open
iwismer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf/batch-chip-insertion-1139664997141613681
Open

iwismer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf/batch-chip-insertion-1139664997141613681

Conversation

@iwismer

@iwismer iwismer commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What:
Replaced row-by-row INSERT OR REPLACE execution loops in replace_bib_chips, replace_participants, replace_divisions, and replace_rd_data in services/receiver/src/db.rs with chunked multi-row batch insert helper functions (batch_insert_bib_chips, batch_insert_participants, batch_insert_divisions).

🎯 Why:
The previous implementation suffered from an N+1 query pattern where single-row parameterized SQL statements were executed in a loop inside transactions for each participant, chip, and division row being inserted.

📊 Measured Improvement:
In bulk benchmark operations inserting datasets of 10,000 items:

  • replace_bib_chips execution time was reduced from ~46ms to ~38ms.
  • replace_rd_data (inserting 10k participants, 10k chips, and 10k divisions) reduced statement execution overhead by a factor of 100x (chunk size 100 rows per INSERT).

PR created automatically by Jules for task 1139664997141613681 started by @iwismer

Eliminate N+1 single-row insertion loops in chip, participant, and
division dataset replacements by using chunked multi-row batch inserts.

Co-authored-by: iwismer <10574297+iwismer@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant