Update GitHub Action changesets/action to v1.8.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
changesets/action	action	minor	v1.5.3 → v1.8.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

changesets/action (changesets/action)

v1.8.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​258 f5dbf72 Thanks @​tom-sherman! - Support draft version PR modes with a new prDraft input. Use create to create new version PRs as drafts, or always to also convert existing version PRs back to draft when updating them.

Patch Changes

• #​502 6002dbd Thanks @​oshytiko! - Fixed initial .changeset state being picked up, when cwd parameter is provided

• #​536 81b3f61 Thanks @​radnan! - Fixed .changeset state being picked for the version command when cwd parameter is provided

v1.7.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​564 935fe87 Thanks @​Andarist! - Automatically use the GitHub-provided token to allow most users to avoid explicit GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} configuration.

Patch Changes

• #​545 54220dd Thanks @​ryanbas21! - The .npmrc generation now intelligently handles both traditional NPM token authentication and trusted publishing scenarios by only appending the auth token when NPM_TOKEN is defined. This prevents 'undefined' from being written to the registry configuration when using OIDC tokens from GitHub Actions trusted publishing.

• #​563 6af4a7e Thanks @​Andarist! - Don't error on already committed symlinks and executables that stay untouched

v1.6.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​558 342005d Thanks @​harsha-venugopal-ledn! - Upgrade from Node.js 20 to Node.js 24 LTS

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 2am on saturday"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:09pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:09pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:09pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single third-party action version pin in the release workflow with unchanged inputs; typical Renovate maintenance with limited blast radius unless the action regresses.

Overview
Bumps the pinned changesets/action reference in .github/workflows/release.yml from v1.5.3 to v1.8.0 (commit SHA updated). The Create Release Pull Request or Publish to npm step still uses the same publish / version commands and GITHUB_TOKEN / NPM_TOKEN env; nothing else in the workflow file changes.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a82f84b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/gha/changesets-action-1.x (a82f84b) with main (f9d6417)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (77925d8) during the generation of this report, so f9d6417 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the release workflow to use changesets/action v1.8.0 instead of v1.5.3 (updated pinned SHA).

Why: Incorporates upstream changesets action fixes and improvements to the automated release/changeset PR process.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.541 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$49.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$62.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$403 \mathrm{ms} \pm 737 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$283 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.951 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.521 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$33.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$32.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.211 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$33.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 563 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$97.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$99.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.521 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$156 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$597 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.27 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph