BE-573: Upgrade libp2p to 0.57.0 via git patch by indietyp · Pull Request #8761 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-05-26T18:51:21Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR upgrades the rust-libp2p dependency stack to version 0.57.0, pinned to a specific git revision (86b2122c8ffdd636d0c939b0344bf59a35c97499) from the upstream repository. This brings in the latest libp2p crate versions across the board, including the newly added libp2p-gossipsub crate, and aligns all transitive dependencies accordingly.

🔗 Related links

https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p

🔍 What does this change?

Upgrades libp2p from 0.56.0 to 0.57.0 and pins all libp2p crates to git revision 86b2122c8ffdd636d0c939b0344bf59a35c97499
Adds libp2p-gossipsub 0.50.0 as a new dependency included in the libp2p feature set
Upgrades hickory-proto and hickory-resolver from 0.25.x to 0.26.x, adding the new hickory-net crate
Upgrades futures-bounded from 0.2.4 to 0.3.0, switching its timer backend from futures-timer to tokio
Upgrades hashlink from 0.10.0 to 0.11.0 (now backed by hashbrown 0.16)
Upgrades igd-next from 0.16.2 to 0.17.0
Upgrades x509-parser from 0.17.0 to 0.18.1
Replaces the dual prometheus-client versions (0.23.1 and 0.24.1) with a single 0.24.1 version
Removes the duplicate unsigned-varint 0.7.2 dependency, consolidating on 0.8.0
Adds jni 0.22.4 alongside the existing jni 0.21.1, required by the updated hickory crates
Downgrades wasm-bindgen and related crates from 0.2.118 to 0.2.108 to align with libp2p's requirements
Removes enum-as-inner as a transitive dependency (no longer needed by hickory-proto)
Adds async-channel, event-listener, event-listener-strategy, prefix-trie, ndk-context, simd_cesu8, hex_fmt, and send_wrapper as new transitive dependencies

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Existing networking and libp2p integration tests

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch
Run cargo build to confirm the dependency tree resolves correctly
Run the existing networking test suite to confirm libp2p functionality is unaffected

vercel · 2026-05-26T18:51:27Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:04pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:04pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 7:04pm

cursor · 2026-05-26T18:51:30Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches core P2P, DNS, TLS, and QUIC transitive stacks used by harpc networking; risk is dependency drift and runtime behavior, mitigated by existing integration tests rather than code edits here.

Overview
Upgrades the workspace libp2p stack from 0.56 to 0.57 by bumping workspace dependency versions and adding [patch.crates-io] entries that pin the full libp2p family to upstream git revision 86b2122c8ffdd636d0c939b0344bf59a35c97499, so builds resolve against that snapshot instead of crates.io.

Cargo.lock shifts with the new graph: libp2p-gossipsub appears as a dependency of the umbrella crate, hickory DNS moves to 0.26 (including hickory-net), and several transitive crates align (e.g. futures-bounded 0.3 with tokio, consolidated prometheus-client / unsigned-varint, wasm-bindgen pulled to 0.2.108). No application Rust sources change in this diff—only workspace manifests and the lockfile.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit dd6bf38. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

indietyp · 2026-05-26T18:51:37Z

BE-573: Upgrade libp2p to 0.57.0 via git patch #8761 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

codecov · 2026-05-26T18:55:37Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.96%. Comparing base (cb459a8) to head (dd6bf38).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8761      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.81%   58.96%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1340      +12     
  Lines      126811   129010    +2199     
  Branches     5790     5832      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        74580    76077    +1497     
- Misses      51350    52035     +685     
- Partials      881      898      +17

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.74% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (-1.38%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-core	`79.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.88% <ø> (-1.66%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-26T18:59:14Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing bm/be-573-fix-rust-dependency-vulnerabilities-from-dependabot-alerts (dd6bf38) with main (f9d6417)¹}

No successful run was found on main (77925d8) during the generation of this report, so f9d6417 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

augmentcode · 2026-05-26T19:04:01Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR upgrades the Rust libp2p dependency stack to align the repo with rust-libp2p v0.57.0.

Changes:

Bumps workspace dependency versions for libp2p and key subcrates (core/identity/ping/stream/swarm/yamux) to the 0.57.0-era releases.
Upgrades multistream-select to 0.14.0 to match the updated libp2p ecosystem.
Adds a comprehensive [patch.crates-io] section to pin libp2p and related crates to a specific upstream git revision (86b2122 6).
Keeps default-features = false on the workspace dependency declarations to preserve current feature selection behavior.

Technical Notes: The git patching ensures a single, consistent libp2p crate set is used across the workspace, avoiding mixed-source/mixed-version resolution when transitive crates pull in libp2p components.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

github-actions · 2026-05-26T20:15:02Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.987 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$53.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$421 \mathrm{ms} \pm 692 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 444 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$86.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$298 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$36.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$93.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.668 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 716 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 616 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 695 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 497 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$159 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$597 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

indietyp added 2 commits May 26, 2026 09:56

chore: lockfile

7ddffa7

fix: patch

dd6bf38

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp May 26, 2026

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 26, 2026

indietyp requested a review from TimDiekmann May 26, 2026 18:52

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 26, 2026 18:53 View deployment

TimDiekmann approved these changes May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge May 26, 2026 18:53

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 26, 2026 18:55 View deployment

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 26, 2026 19:04 View deployment

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue May 26, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit eff686d May 26, 2026
179 checks passed

TimDiekmann deleted the bm/be-573-fix-rust-dependency-vulnerabilities-from-dependabot-alerts branch May 26, 2026 19:31

Conversation

indietyp commented May 26, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

indietyp commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 26, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

indietyp commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

augmentcode Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading