H-6487: Add AI assistant to Petrinaut + demo website

[CiaranMn]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

1. Add the Petrinaut AI assistant UI
2. Adds the endpoint to the demo website that proxies to the AI provider (OpenAI for now)
3. Adds a 'fractal file structure' skill (since I made the AI part of @hashintel/petrinaut organised in this way)

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Some new added ones.

❓ How to test this?

1. Open the preview deployment
2. For local testing, turbo run dev in petrinaut-website after copying .env.example to .env and setting an OPENAI_API_KEY. If you want simulation mode to work – it doesn't when running the website in dev mode – you need to use npx vercel dev instead (which will build the site and serve it, as well as serving the chat API endpoint)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 25, 2026 5:17pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 25, 2026 5:17pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 25, 2026 5:17pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

High Risk
Introduces an authenticated chat proxy with rate limiting and broad AI-driven document mutations; the instance API break (mutations/commands, no mutate) affects all consumers.

Overview
Adds an AI assistant to Petrinaut: optional aiAssistant on <Petrinaut> (Vercel AI SDK chat + tool loop), a bottom-bar toggle, and expanded core AI tools (read net/title, compilation diagnostics, rename, applyAutoLayout) with richer schema descriptions and a longer system prompt.

Core API refactor: Petrinaut drops raw mutate and top-level mutation methods in favor of instance.mutations and instance.commands (clipboard paste, ELK auto-layout moved from UI into core with elkjs). React uses usePetrinautMutations / usePetrinautCommands with read-only guards; MutationProvider is removed.

Demo site: apps/petrinaut-website gains /api/chat (OpenAI streaming, IP rate limits, message validation), Vite dev middleware mirroring production fetch handlers, per-net localStorage for chat history, and Vercel function config.

Also: new DS icon (arrowsLeftRight), pulse/shimmer animations, zod 4.4.3 bumps, fractal file-structuring Claude skill, .vercel in .gitignore.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 67ba2f0. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

This pull request is abnormally large and would use a significant amount of tokens to review. If you still wish to review it, comment "augment review" and we will review it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.83%. Comparing base (0eb9937) to head (5c79142).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8750      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.83%   62.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1368     1368              
  Lines      140845   140845              
  Branches     5859     5859              
==========================================
- Hits        88502    88501       -1     
- Misses      51412    51413       +1     
  Partials      931      931              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.18% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	81.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	91.58% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing cm/petrinaut-ai-assistant-mvp (67ba2f0) with main (ae5c317)}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit bee10aa. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.768 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.471 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.10 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.23 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.784 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$38.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.873 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$329 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$231 \mathrm{ms} \pm 555 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$6.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$75.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 580 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$95.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$99.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$79.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$83.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$83.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$430 \mathrm{ms} \pm 604 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[kube]

Good job!