Skip to content

[GHSA-6jwv-w5xf-7j27] go.etcd.io/bbolt affected by index out-of-range vulnerability#7329

Open
ryanbekhen wants to merge 1 commit intoryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7329from
ryanbekhen-GHSA-6jwv-w5xf-7j27
Open

[GHSA-6jwv-w5xf-7j27] go.etcd.io/bbolt affected by index out-of-range vulnerability#7329
ryanbekhen wants to merge 1 commit intoryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7329from
ryanbekhen-GHSA-6jwv-w5xf-7j27

Conversation

@ryanbekhen
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ryanbekhen ryanbekhen commented Apr 8, 2026

Updates

  • Summary
  • Description
  • Modified timestamp

Comments

The current description is accurate but too brief for downstream impact assessment. It does not explain that exploitation requires a malformed or attacker-controlled BoltDB file, and that the practical impact is primarily denial of service via panic/crash rather than direct confidentiality or integrity loss.

Clarifying these points would help maintainers distinguish local file-control scenarios from remotely reachable attack surfaces and apply appropriate mitigations while no patched release is available.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 8, 2026 14:37
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to ryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7329 April 8, 2026 14:38
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the GitHub-reviewed advisory entry for GHSA-6jwv-w5xf-7j27 (go.etcd.io/bbolt) to provide clearer downstream impact and exploitation context, focusing on practical DoS/panic risk from malformed BoltDB files.

Changes:

  • Refines the advisory summary to explicitly call out panic/DoS behavior.
  • Expands the advisory details with impact, prerequisites, and mitigation guidance.
  • Bumps the advisory modified timestamp.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants