Repository navigation
Conversation
c-suvamsa
requested review from
jonmaaku-rev,
mira-mohammad,
nimit2801,
roycabezas and
sumisunz
as code owners
October 15, 2026 15:56
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the Claude Code / Claude Sonnet 5.5 leaderboard submission. Acknowledged by Nimit’s intake workflow; this is not approval. Both validation checks currently pass. Technical review still needs to verify:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
tasks/v1via Daytona; 14 tasks × 10 attempts, concurrency 4; Harbor 0.24.0.PR checklist – leaderboard row entry
Provenance and access
n_trials.Run conditions and review
enterprise-benchmain. The job used a localtasks/v1path, not a registry-pinned dataset version.Validation
validateandvalidate-leaderboardCI checks pass.Notes for reviewers
One trial (
sales-l2-b__eCx33ec) recordedAgentTimeoutErrorat the default 600-second agent limit after submitting a substantive answer. The verifier awarded that trial reward 1.0; its trajectory, usage, cost, and exception are retained, and the submitted score follows the job's recorded reward without excluding or substituting the trial. Please review that exception when assessing comparability.