fix(system): isolate sliced system metadata

[njzjz-bot]

Fixes #985.

Deep-copy frame-selected arrays and frame-independent metadata so subsystem slices cannot mutate their source through NumPy views or shared lists.

Tests: cd tests && python -m unittest test_system_append

Why existing tests missed it: The existing tests only compared sliced values; they never mutated a slice, so aliasing remained invisible.

Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.144.4
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved subsystem creation to prevent unintended data sharing when slicing frame-dependent data.
  • Updated append behavior so adopting a whole incoming system no longer causes nested array/list aliasing between systems.
  • Subsystem and appended changes no longer unexpectedly modify the original source data.

• Tests

  • Added regression tests to verify data ownership for subsystem slicing and first append behavior.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

✅ 2 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing njzjz-bot:fix/issue-985 (8969202) with master (d2105f6)}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@njzjz, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 54 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b0fb6c6d-a292-426e-85dd-2de5c2e1ca7d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 527e2d4 and 8969202.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• dpdata/system.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

System.sub_system and the initial System.append path now deep-copy nested data, with tests covering mutation isolation for subsystem slices and first-appended systems.

Changes

System ownership isolation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Deep-copy derived and appended data dpdata/system.py	System.sub_system deep-copies frame-dependent and frame-independent fields, while the initial System.append path deep-copies incoming system data.
Ownership regression coverage tests/test_system_append.py	Tests verify that mutations to subsystem or source data do not affect the parent or first-appended target.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• deepmodeling/dpdata#1015: Also deep-copies incoming data in the initial System.append path.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately reflects the main change: making sliced system metadata independent.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR addresses #985 by deep-copying sub_system data and the first append path, with regression tests covering both cases.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The changes stay focused on System ownership and regression tests, with no unrelated code paths introduced.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@tests/test_system_append.py`:
- Around line 45-54: Update System.append() so its first-append path deep-copies
system.data instead of using a shallow dictionary copy, ensuring nested lists
and NumPy arrays do not alias the source. Preserve the existing append behavior
for non-empty systems.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c713429b-f5d4-4b18-b072-81d23c410825

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0416b54 and 8a6b8b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• dpdata/system.py
• tests/test_system_append.py

[wanghan-iapcm]

Requesting changes: this fixes the sub_system half of #985 but leaves the first-append()-into-empty path aliased, so the PR's own test_first_append_does_not_alias_source fails and CI (build 3.10 / 3.13) is red. See the inline note for the one-line fix.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.94%. Comparing base (d2105f6) to head (8969202).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1014   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.94%   86.94%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines        9178     9178           
=======================================
  Hits         7980     7980           
  Misses       1198     1198           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.