Prototype header-based durable agent entrypoint - #480
Draft
shivam5 wants to merge 5 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What did you change, and why?
This is a draft interface prototype for preserving an application's existing JSON request body while adding durable execution metadata through HTTP headers. It is an alternative to the wrapped JSON contract in #476 and the explicit server in #477.
Developer contract
The client keeps its existing
/invocationsbody. It supplies small execution metadata separately:The server validates and persists the original body plus normalized session metadata. It constructs
context.run_id,context.session_id,context.attempt,context.is_recovery, andcontext.emit()for the agent. After a crash there are no request headers to replay; the server reconstructs context from the durable run record.Durable CUJ in the cookbook
requires_action.context.session_id.context.emit()and replayed with cursors.@app.on_resume.context.emit()How do you know it works?
29focused runtime/store/app tests pass.openai-agents==0.19.4; no live model call was made.Background and streaming client contract
GET /invocations/{run_id}.context.emit().Databricks-Stream: truereturns SSE; reconnect uses?after=<event-id>.thread_idin the session header.The cookbook README includes concrete OpenAI Agents SDK and LangGraph before/after client snippets for
background=true, stream=true.