Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
No idea what this is trying to communicate |
|
Since it wasn't clear why this is a problem, I asked Grok. This is the explanation, and this explains my PR changes. What the NOTEs say The message is: This is a very common NOTE in R packages. It means the static code analysis in R CMD check cannot see where the variables id and location are defined — even though they probably are defined correctly at runtime. Most likely causes (and fixes) Non-standard evaluation (NSE) / tidy-evaluation style code Fix (preferred modern way): #' @importFrom rlang .data This tells check that these are intentional data-pronoun references and silences the NOTE cleanly without .GlobalEnv hacks. Dynamically created variables or eval(parse()) / metaprogramming Fix: |
|
I think this solves the issue. @W-Mohammed once you are happy feel free to re-submit to CRAN. |
|
Fixed in #142. Closing PR as is now redundant. |
Silence CRAN codetools NOTEs for globals 'id' and 'location' using rlang