Conversation
…yes-compliant (danielmiessler#2071) Question 3 was phrased so that a compliant answer is "no" under the shared "Any no -> not done" gate, so fully verified work failed the literal reading and work still carrying a "should work" passed it. Question 2 had no compliant answer for work that is not web-facing. Reworded both: question 2 admits not-web-facing, question 3 asks whether every "should work" is gone. The gate line and the two sentences below it are unchanged. Version left for the maintainers to roll with the release. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KdVkxUPGxFm91bsNDxyi5M
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2071.
The problem
Constitutional №2's self-check runs three questions through one gate, "Any no → not done." Question 3 ("Any 'should work' left anywhere?") is phrased so that a compliant answer is no, so fully verified work fails the literal reading and work still carrying a "should work" passes it. Question 2 has no compliant answer for work that is not web-facing.
The change
One line in
LIFEOS/LIFEOS_SYSTEM_PROMPT.md:Every compliant answer is now yes, question 2 admits not-web-facing, and the gate line and the two sentences below it are unchanged. The version field is left for the maintainers to roll with the release.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01KdVkxUPGxFm91bsNDxyi5M